Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ANKARA2231 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ANKARA2231 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2004-04-20 15:52:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | CY GR PREL TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 002231 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/20/2014 TAGS: CY, GR, PREL, TU SUBJECT: TURKISH MFA LAYS OUT SERIOUS BUT FIXABLE PROBLEMS WITH DRAFT CYPRUS UNSCR (U) Classified by Ambassador Eric Edelman, E.O. 12958, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 1. (C) This is an action request. See paragraph 8. 2. (C) Summary: In an April 20 meeting with Ambassador Edelman and UK Ambassador Westmacott Turkish MFA officials laid out objections to the timing and language of the draft UNSCR on Cyprus. The Turks prefer a UNSCR be passed after the referendum but understand a pre-referendum resolution may help bring AKEL on board. MFA officials are seriously concerned about implied reference to UNSCR 186; omission of references to the Treaties of Alliance and Guarantee and rights of guarantor powers; and implications that the new UN force will have "enforcement" power. Failure to address these concerns might break the balance in Ankara, particularly with the military. End Summary. 3. (C) MFA Deputy U/S Ilkin said the timing of the UNSCR is premature; it should be after the referendum. The Turks took Ambassador Edelman's point that the UNSCR is an effort to get the GCs, particularly AKEL, to yes. 4. (C) Taken as a whole, the MFA thinks several aspects of the draft fail to conform to the spirit and letter of the Annan Plan. 5. (C) Ilkin noted the draft UNSCR made refers to "all previous resolutions on Cyprus." By implication, this includes UNSCR 186, which recognized the ROC as the sole government of Cyprus. This, Ilkin argued, contradicts Annan's "virgin birth" concept. Ilkin also noted that the draft makes no reference to the Treaties of Alliance and Guarantee. This is a sensitive point for the Turkish military. While the Turks prefer no reference to UNSCRs, Ambassador Edelman confirmed they will probably be satisfied on these two points if the text is changed to read "all relevant resolutions and treaties." 6. (C) Ziyal and Ilkin both expressed concern about the draft's reference to Chapter VII. Ilkin said this changes the UN force from a peacekeeping force to a "peace enforcement" force. Cyprus Department Head Bilman noted that the draft preamble refers to "a strengthened United Nations operation to provide, inter alia, monitoring, verification and supervision" of implementation. Bilman worries that the phrase "inter alia" could be taken to imply enforcement. The draft also omits a footnote in the Annan Plan Bilman said was the subject of much bargaining in Burgenstock and was crucial to gaining the Turkish military's assent: "58. Observation: The United Nations operation would not assume direct responsibility for the enforcement of law and order." 7. (C) We strongly recommend SCC Weston and USUN work together for the following changes to the draft UNSCR: -- Substitute the phrase "all relevant resolutions and treaties" for "all previous resolutions on Cyprus." -- Explicitly limit the reference to Chapter VII to the arms embargo and explicitly exclude its relevance to peacekeeping operations. -- Delete the phrase "inter alia" and insert a reference to footnote 58. 8. The MFA is sending us talking points detailing their objections and requested changes. We will forward to the Department, Embassy Nicosia, and USUN as soon as we receive them. 9. (C) Comment: Even if the referendum fails on the GC side, Ziyal worries this draft language, if unchanged, could haunt the Ankara consensus and provide ammunition for anti-solution forces in the military, bureaucracy and Parliament as Ankara tries to move forward on Cyprus after April 24. We share his concerns. End Summary. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04