Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04BOGOTA3775 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04BOGOTA3775 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bogota |
| Created: | 2004-04-14 17:17:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PTER KJUS PHUM PINR CO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 003775 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PTER, KJUS, PHUM, PINR, CO SUBJECT: NEW "LAW OF JUSTICE AND COMPENSATION" SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS REF: BOGOTA 3346 1. (U) At an April 12 meeting with the local diplomatic corps, High Commissioner for Peace Luis Carlos Restrepo provided the following detailed sequence for the operation of the draft &Law of Justice and Compensation,8 a new version of the previous &alternative sentencing" or "conditional parole" law, which establishes the legal framework for peace talks with all illegal armed groups, most immediately with illegal self-defense forces, otherwise known as paramilitaries (reftel). The law (sent to WHA/AND) should be debated in Congress within the next two weeks. The government believes it has the votes to pass the law. During the briefing to more than 80 ambassadors, Restrepo reiterated that extradition was not on the table in negotiations with the paramilitaries. 2. (U) The proposed legal approach would function as follows: -------------------------- Preconditions for Benefits -------------------------- a. An illegal armed group (IAG) declares and fulfills a cease-fire and signs a peace agreement with the government. b. The IAG provides a list of members who are potential beneficiaries of the Law of Justice and Compensation (exclusively for crimes related to the IAG's activities). c. The government reviews the list and submits it to the Fiscalia (Prosecutor General's Office) for investigation and prosecution and to the newly constituted "Tribunal for Truth, Justice, and Compensation" for eventual judgment and sentencing. The Tribunal will require each potential beneficiary to provide restitution to victims, pay compensation, and cooperate in peace-making. -------------------------------------------- First Stage with the Fiscalia: Investigation -------------------------------------------- d. A special unit of prosecutors from the Fiscalia reviews all open investigations against each potential beneficiary. e. The unit combines all these legal proceedings into one case and completes the investigation. f. The investigation results in either an indictment (in cases that, under normal circumstance, would go to trial) or a plea bargain. g. The unit submits its findings to the Tribunal. --------------------------------------------- --------- First Stage with the Tribunal: Judgment and Sentencing --------------------------------------------- --------- h. The Tribunal canvasses judges throughout the country for pending charges and prior convictions against the potential beneficiary. i. The Tribunal combines all pending charges into one case and determines a single finding of responsibility for each potential beneficiary. j. It combines this judgment with any prior convictions and issues one consolidated sentence for each individual. k. The Tribunal submits an opinion to the President for each potential beneficiary, with a recommendation on whether or not an individual should benefit from an alternative sentence. ------------------------- First Presidential Review ------------------------- l. The President reviews the Tribunal's opinion. m. The President cannot overrule a recommendation against granting an alternative sentence. n. The President decides who will benefit among those recommended for an alternative sentence. o. The President returns the approved list to the Tribunal. --------------------------------------------- --------- Second Stage with the Tribunal: Alternative Sentencing --------------------------------------------- --------- p. The Tribunal issues an alternative sentence to each beneficiary (between five and ten years in confinement). q. The Tribunal suspends the remainder of the original sentence. r. The Tribunal determines what reparations the beneficiary must make to victims. s. The Tribunal determines what peace-making activities the beneficiary must undertake. t. The Tribunal imposes auxiliary punishments, such as a suspension of the right to carry a firearm or hold elected office. u. The Tribunal submits its decision to the President. -------------------------- Second Presidential Review -------------------------- v. The President determines where the beneficiary will serve the alternative sentence. --------------------------------------- Fulfillment of the Alternative Sentence --------------------------------------- w. After completing the alternative sentence and fulfilling all other obligations, a beneficiary enters a period of supervised parole that last for either five (if the alternative sentence was for less than six years) or ten years (if the alternative sentence was for six or more years). x. If a beneficiary fails to comply with his or her parole conditions, including eschewing criminal activity and complying with auxiliary punishments, the alternative sentence will be revoked and the original sentence reimposed. y. If a beneficiary complies with all parole conditions, he or she will be released without further obligations beyond those of any other citizen. 3.(U) The law would expire on December 31, 2006 (almost five months after President Uribe's term is over). Both the Brazilian and the Italian representatives questioned whether this would give the IAGs more than two years to continue to commit atrocities. Restrepo said the GOC had considered that possibility and the alternatives, and in the end had decided that providing an ultimatum with a reasonable, but limited, time for the law's implementation was the best approach. He also said that the GOC wanted to time the law so that the next government, which will take office in August 2006, could evaluate its results and seek any changes it wanted. WOOD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04