Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04KATHMANDU677 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04KATHMANDU677 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kathmandu |
| Created: | 2004-04-09 08:17:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PGOV PTER NP Political Parties |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 090817Z Apr 04
UNCLAS KATHMANDU 000677 SIPDIS DEPT FOR SA/INS AND DS/IP/SA, NSC FOR MILLARD, LONDON FOR POL/GURNEY E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, PTER, NP, Political Parties SUBJECT: NEPAL: GOVERNMENT BAN ON PUBLIC GATHERINGS IGNORED BY POLITICAL PARTIES REF: KATHMANDU 620 1. Summary. Late on April 8, the Government of Nepal (GON) declared a ban on all public gatherings, except for religious purposes, of more than 5 people. Despite the ban, roughly 4000 political party activists attempted to gather in central Kathmandu on April 9, but a heavy police presence prevented the protesters from marching in the direction of the Royal Palace. By 1600 hours, police personnel deployed in the area had arrested between 300-400 people and, in one instance, had charged the crowds in response to stone-throwing. This is the second time Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa has imposed a ban on public gatherings, which have also been used by previous democratically-elected governments to prevent civil disturbance. April 9 witnessed the second lowest turnout since the protests began on April 1, most likely in reaction to the government ban. End Summary. 2. Late in the evening of April 8, the Home Ministry released a public statement declaring areas where protesters normally gather to be "riot-torn" areas and imposed a ban on gatherings, except for religious purposes, of more than 5 people in these areas. According to the statement, the Government of Nepal initiated the ban as a result of information that the Maoists had infiltrated the political protests and intended to exploit them to incite violence. Political party leaders quickly criticized the ban and indicated that the parties would continue into the ninth day of public demonstrations. 3. At approximately 1300 hours, political activists began to gather in and around the Ratna Park area in central Kathmandu. By 1400, approximately 4,000 demonstrators had gathered in various groups, but a heavy police presence prevented them from converging into one mass. The police moved quickly to arrest potential protesters. By 1530, almost 200 demonstrators had been arrested, including roughly one dozen senior party leaders, such as CPN-UML Chairman Madhav Nepal, the President of People's Front Nepal, Amik Sherchen, and the head of Nepal's Workers and Peasants Party, Naryan Bijukchhe. Tensions rose following the arrests when police charged a group of protesters with "lathi," or bamboo canes, in response to stone-throwing by the protesters. Whether anyone was seriously injured remains unknown. 4. Comment. The government ban on public gatherings is the second such ban under Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa. The first instance was in September 2003, following the collapse of the ceasefire on August 27 and was imposed in response to political party protests, which the government feared the Maoists would use to incite violence. Like today, the parties chose to ignore the ban and, as a result, nearly 1,000 demonstrators were arrested, but were released shortly thereafter. Previous democratically-elected governments in Nepal, including the most recent one, have also imposed bans on public gatherings. April 9 witnessed the second lowest turnout by political protesters since the demonstrations began on April 1. (The lowest turnout occurred on April 7, most likely due to rainy weather.) While the low attendance today is likely a response to the government ban, journalists and other intellectuals have suggested that the current political movement in Kathmandu is not inspiring the masses with the same ideological fervor and commitment witnessed in the 1990 "Jana Andolan," or People's Movement, that precipitated Nepal's transition to democracy. End Comment. MALINOWSKI
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04