US embassy cable - 04ABUDHABI903

Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.

UAE: Reaction to U.S. veto on resolution condemning Israel

Identifier: 04ABUDHABI903
Wikileaks: View 04ABUDHABI903 at Wikileaks.org
Origin: Embassy Abu Dhabi
Created: 2004-03-29 12:24:00
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Tags: PREL IS TC
Redacted: This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks.
null
Diana T Fritz  03/15/2007 03:02:03 PM  From  DB/Inbox:  Search Results

Cable 
Text:                                                                      
                                                                           
      
CONFIDENTIAL

SIPDIS
TELEGRAM                                           March 29, 2004


To:       No Action Addressee                                    

Action:   Unknown                                                

From:     AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI (ABU DHABI 903 - UNKNOWN)          

TAGS:     PREL                                                   

Captions: None                                                   

Subject:  UAE: REACTION TO U.S. VETO ON RESOLUTION CONDEMNING    
          ISRAEL                                                 

Ref:      None                                                   
_________________________________________________________________
C O N F I D E N T I A L        ABU DHABI 00903

SIPDIS
CXABU:
    ACTION: POL 
    INFO:   RSO AMB DCM P/M ECON 

DISSEMINATION: POL
CHARGE: PROG

APPROVED: AMB:MMWAHBA
DRAFTED: POL:JFMAYBURY
CLEARED: DCM:RAALBRIGHT

VZCZCADI248
OO RUEHC RUEHDE RUEHXK RUCNDT
DE RUEHAD #0903 0891224
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 291224Z MAR 04
FM AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3746
INFO RUEHXK/ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 1176
RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI 3893
C O N F I D E N T I A L ABU DHABI 000903 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR NEA/FO, NEA/ARP, NEA/IAI 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/28/2009 
TAGS: PREL, IS, TC 
SUBJECT: UAE: Reaction to U.S. veto on resolution 
condemning Israel 
 
Ref: State 67064 
 
Classified by Ambassador Marcelle M. Wahba, reasons 
1.5 (b) and (d). 
 
1. (C) Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of State for 
Foreign Affairs Shaykh Hamdan bin Zayed told the 
Ambassador that the March 25 U.S. veto on the 
resolution condemning Israel for Shaykh Ahmed Yassin's 
death was a "very disturbing development," and added 
that the primary goal should now be to calm the 
situation.  The Ambassador said a veto could have been 
avoided had the resolution been balanced and not one- 
sided.  While the resolution condemned the killing of 
Shaykh Yassin, the leader of HAMAS, it did not condemn 
HAMAS, which has promoted terror and violence. 
 
2. (C) Shaykh Yassin's assassination and the 
subsequent U.S. veto on the resolution condemning 
Israel have been the major topics at majlises, coffee 
shops, classrooms, and in newspapers.  Our contacts 
say that the veto will encourage Israel to go ahead 
and kill other leaders of HAMAS, and possibly even 
Arafat.  The common perception is that the U.S. will 
protect Israel no matter what Israel does.  While the 
U.S. gets blamed for protecting Israel, Arab states 
get blamed for failing to gain the respect of the U.S. 
 
3. (C) During the Ambassador's visit to UAE University 
in Al Ain to open an American Corners exhibit on March 
27, a student asked how the U.S., which claims that it 
supports human rights, could veto the UN resolution 
condemning Israel for the assassination of Shaykh 
Yassin.  The Ambassador replied that the resolution 
did not include a condemnation of HAMAS and was 
drafted in a one-sided manner to embarrass the U.S. 
The day of Shaykh Yassin's assassination, students in 
a political science class at Zayed University engaged 
in an hour-long discussion about his assassination and 
his role in the Arab-Israeli dispute instead of 
hearing the scheduled lecture.  "The students' 
sentiments were similar to those echoed in all parts 
of the Middle East. There is frustration and anger," 
professor Nadir El Mahdy said. 
WAHBA 

Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04