Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04YEREVAN739 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04YEREVAN739 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Yerevan |
| Created: | 2004-03-29 01:27:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KMDR OPRC PGOV PREL KPAO AM |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 000739 SIPDIS DEPT FOR INR/R/MR-STHIBEAULT, EUR/PPD-MLOGSDON AND SRUEDY, EUR/CACEN-ESIDEREAS, EUR, EUR/ACE, EUR/SNEC, EUR/SE E.O. 12958; N/A TAGS: KMDR, OPRC, PGOV, PREL, KPAO, AM SUBJECT: REACTION FROM YEREVAN, ARMENIA: PRESS CONFERENCE OF DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE RICHARD ARMITAGE 1. SUMMARY: All mass media widely covered the March 26 press conference held by Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage at the Presidential Palace in Yerevan after his meeting with President Kocharian. Among forty invited representatives of mass media, ten represented foreign media outlets. TV reports were mainly accurate and factual. The newspapers carried some comments on the Deputy Secretary's answers at the press conference as well as on his visit in general. Much commentary focused on his statement that a certain amount of progress was achieved at Key West, as opposed to concrete agreements. The following is the summary of those articles. END SUMMARY ARMENIA IS A VERY IMPORTANT COUNTRY IN THE REGION TO THE UNITED STATES 2. Centrist Armenian language daily AZG (03/27) focused on the fact that Richard Armitage did not meet Armenia's opposition while he will do that in Azerbaijan. "The above mentioned comments made by Armitage need some clarifications. What does the phrase "we thought that we had been missing a bit of interaction with Armenia" mean? It was not stated clearly whether it refers to the 2003 presidential and parliamentary elections or U.S.-Armenian relations in general. We should remind you that Washington did not congratulate President Kocharian on his re-election and criticized the parliamentary elections. The fact that only in Armenia Armitage did not meet with the opposition in the countries scheduled for the visit also needs some clarifications. The American diplomat definitely had been informed about the tension in the internal political situation of Armenia. This raises a question, whether not meeting opposition means that Armitage wanted to defuse the tension or that he did not want to encourage the opposition." "On the eve of his visit the U.S. State Department released a statement saying that during his visits to Ukraine, Armenia and Azerbaijan Armitage, in addition to official meetings, will also meet with political leaders and groups. It can be assumed that today, besides the official talks in Baku, Armitage will meet with the opposition leaders, namely with Isa Gambar (sp.) from "Musafat" party and Ali Qerimli (sp.) from "National Front." The Azeri mass media say that by this Armitage wants to win over the opposition. It is known that the Deputy Secretary of State had good friendly relations with the late Heydar Aliyev and now he continues these friendly relations with his son, Ilham Aliyev. During one of the conversations Richard Armitage told Ilham Aliyev that the latter resembles his father and that is why he [Armitage} has a special respect for Ilham. By the way, the opposition in Azerbaijan is condemning Armitage for a decline of democracy in Azerbaijan." ONLY PROGRESS 3. Oppositionist Armenian daily HAYKAKAN ZHAMANAK (03/27) published a front-page short report calling some statements made by the Deputy Secretary sensational. "Yesterday U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage made a sensational statement saying that there were no agreements reached in Key West but only progress. The statement is sensational taking into account the fact that the Foreign Ministry of Armenia has been trying not only to convince us that some agreements between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Karabakh were reached at Key West, but also has been insisting that those agreements were put on paper. The Foreign Ministry of Azerbaijan has been insisting on the opposite with the same persistence. In fact, Armitage yesterday confirmed what they [Azerbaijan] have been saying." ACCORDING TO U.S. THERE WAS PROGRESS NOT AN AGREEMENT 4. Dashnak-affiliated HAYOTS ASHKHAR (03/27) also focused on Armitage's answer regarding the Key West agreements. "Armitage as a participant of Key West talks did not deny the fact of agreements, but as a diplomat he tried to present it in such a way that he would not put the president of Azerbaijan in a difficult situation before his [Armitage's] visit to Azerbaijan." "R. Armitage insisted on the necessity of continuation of negotiations even after the comment made by one of the journalists saying that Azerbaijan expressed misgivings regarding the activities of the OSCE Minsk group." NOT AGREEMENTS BUT PROGRESS 5. Oppositionist Armenian daily ARAVOT (03/27) wrote: "The priorities of the United States foreign policy can be easily identified by the "ranks" of U.S. officials visiting different regions. For example, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell visits Iraq, and SIPDIS sometimes Afghanistan. His Deputy Armitage is visiting CIS countries, and the South Caucasus in particular. Mr. Armitage actually proved this during his press conference yesterday held at the Presidential Palace." I AM HERE TO TRY TO REINVIGORATE POLITICAL TALKS 6. Pro-government Russian language newspaper NOVOYE VREMYA (03/27) published comments on Key West talks and Armitage's participation in them. "In Key West he personally took part in the talks, and according to him, Heydar Aliyev faced serious difficulties in his fatherland when upon his return he presented the discussed proposal for resolution of the conflict. Perhaps there is a small contradiction here. If there was no agreement what kind of "certain progress" can we talk about? It is also not clear why Aliyev faced difficulties if there were no agreements." RICHARD ARMITAGE ANSWERS QUESTIONS 7. Pro-government Russian language newspaper GOLOS ARMENII (03/27) published a mainly factual report on the press conference with only one commentary. "In the best traditions of American abstruseness was the answer to a question about Baku's unwillingness to sit at the negotiation table, which was demonstrated by the recent statement by the Azeri authorities to postpone the meeting scheduled by the OSCE Minsk group to be held in Prague." WALKER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04