Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04BRUSSELS1256 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04BRUSSELS1256 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Brussels |
| Created: | 2004-03-24 16:31:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL EAID XF EUN USEU BRUSSELS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 001256 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/24/2014 TAGS: PREL, EAID, XF, EUN, USEU BRUSSELS SUBJECT: EU STAKES OUT "COMPLEMENTARY BUT DISTINCT" APPROACH TO GME Classified By: Political M/C Kyle Scott. Reason: 1.4 (B)(D) 1. (C) Summary. At its March 22 Foreign Ministers' meeting, the EU welcomed a report outlining a comprehensive European approach to the Middle East. Dubbed "EU Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East," the paper supports the basic ideas underpinning the U.S. reform agenda for the Greater Middle East (GME), but seeks to define a complementary but distinct approach for Europe. The Europeans will be shopping their ideas around the Middle East over the coming months, but this week's endorsement of the Irish Presidency's interim report indicates we have the EU on board on GME as long as they can maintain an independent profile. End Summary. Vibrant Debate in Brussels Culminates in Irish Strategy Paper --------------------------------------------- ---------------- 2. (U) At this week's EU FM meeting, the EU welcomed an interim report prepared by the Irish Presidency on a European strategy toward the Middle East. The report was mandated in December 2003, and was the result of intensive consultations in Brussels over the past two months. U/S Grossman's discussions with Hirep Javier Solana and PSC Ambassadors stimulated a vibrant debate inside the EU on how it should proceed. Sixteen papers were submitted by EU member states, the Council, and Commission and used as input in producing the final draft submitted by the Irish. 3. (U) The Irish paper attempts to lay out the core elements of a European strategy toward the Middle East. The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP - commonly called the Barcelona Process) remains the cornerstone of EU policy. The EU is the dominant trade partner in the region, but also a significant donor: it contributes nearly one billion euros each year to EU development assistance activities in the Barcelona countries, and the European Investment Bank offers financing worth another two billion euros annually. The Irish paper puts great stress on this "partnership," emphasizing that any efforts to reach out to the countries of the Middle East must offer them a sense of "ownership." 4. (U) The EU also seeks to bind its policy in the region firmly to its commitment to remain fully engaged in seeking resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. The EU FM's noted that "progress on the resolution of the Middle East conflict cannot be a pre-condition for confronting the urgent reform challenges facing the countries of the region, nor vice versa. But it is clear that it will not be possible to build a common zone of peace, prosperity and progress unless a just and lasting settlement of the conflict is in place. The lack of clear prospects for peace is already making it harder for reformers in the region to succeed." EU Objectives and Principles: The Eleven Points --------------------------------------------- -- 5. (U) The Irish text outlines eleven key objectives and principles for EU policy in the region, as follows: 1) Promote the development of a common zone of peace, prosperity and progress; 2) Geographic scope: primarily North Africa and the Middle East; 3) Resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict will be a strategic priority; 4) Partnership requires long-term and sustained engagement; 5) The EU should strengthen its political dialogue with the region; 6) The EU should use its dialogue with countries of the region to promote human rights and the rule of law; 7) The EU should promote action and cooperation on terrorism, WMD and non-proliferation; 8) The EU will support internally driven reforms in the economic, political and social spheres, noting in particular the UNDP Human Development Report emphasis on education, good governance and women's empowerment; 9) The EU will seek an "enhanced security dialogue" (not further explained); 10) The EU will support modernization of the regulatory environment in the region to promote WTO membership; and 11) The EU will work closely with the US, the UN and other external actors in pursuit of these goals. Comment ------- 6. (C) In presenting its "Eleven Points," the EU has covered much of the same ground that underpins the President's Forward Strategy for Freedom, and is clearly on track to support the ideas in our GME initiative. The challenge will be keeping them there in the coming months. The next steps for the EU are to begin a series of consultations with countries in the Middle East on their "Strategic Partnership" ideas, so that a final concept document can be adopted by the EU at their June Council session (June 17-18). That meeting, falling as it does between the G-8 and the US/EU summits, will be an opportunity to highlight the "complementary but distinct approach" of the EU. Already, however, we are hearing concerns from the Council and Commission that events in Gaza may divert the Arab League summit and ruin chances for a unified appeal for reform in the region. Without this or some other plausible "sense of ownership" for Middle East reform, the EU will be reluctant to step forward boldly. SCHNABEL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04