Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04MADRID826 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04MADRID826 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Madrid |
| Created: | 2004-03-10 16:46:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | AMGT KREC SP |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MADRID 000826 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR M, DS, DS/OFM, EUR/EX, EUR/WE E.O. 12958:DECL: N/A TAGS: AMGT, KREC, SP SUBJECT: OFM AND EMBASSY MADRID DISCUSS TAX AND VEHICLE ISSUES WITH SPANISH MFA 1. Summary: DS/OFM DAS lead a negotiating team consisting of Embassy Management Counselor, HRO Senior FSN, and an OFM Program Officer in discussions with Spanish representatives of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Finance. This meeting focused on two issues: (1) the continued practice of the GoS to not grant the A&T staff the same tax relief benefits extended to diplomats and consular personnel and (2) the lengthy period it takes for official and personal vehicles to be properly registered and plated in Spain, including the issuance of cover plates. End Summary. 2. DAS began the meeting by explaining the role of OFM and its interest in the tax and vehicle privileges extended to US Mission personnel worldwide. OFM's authority to employ reciprocity without further approval from Congress was also detailed. With this point as background, it was stressed to the Spanish side that improvements in their treatment of Post and its personnel, especially in the area of tax relief, could allow for an immediate and positive response from OFM. 3. Given that during past negotiations the Spanish Government has made clear that their interpretations of the tax relief obligations detailed in the VCDR and VCCR are inconsistent with those of the USG, a decision was made not to readdress this line of argument, but rather to seek a practical solution to this real problem for A&T staff. DAS expressed the personal interest of Secretary Powell in securing the equitable treatment for all accredited members of US Missions abroad. The Spanish were further informed that their policy of disallowing tax privileges for members of the A&T staff is practiced by only three other nations: the Bahamas, Barbados, and Morocco. The US side advised that, according to OFM records, Spanish A&T personnel make up 53% of the nation's Mission to the US. To provide a possible roadmap for achieving a mutually beneficial solution to this issue, information on recent agreements that resulted in the reciprocal extension of tax benefits to A&T personnel at the US Mission in Austria and Slovenia were discussed. 4. The Spanish delegation, led by the MFA's Director General of Protocol, began by expressing envy for the unique authority granted to OFM for dealing with matters of this nature. He advised that under current regulations, the GoS had little leeway to quickly address or remedy the A&T tax situation. Currently, such an action would require a change of law, which can be a lengthy and uncertain process. Diplomatic privileges in Spain are not extended by virtue of reciprocity and are uniform by decree. Therefore, bilateral agreements on such issues do not appear viable. However, the Spanish side agreed to study this issue and explore possible solutions with the best of intentions. 5. Secondly, DAS discussed Post's concerns with the current lengthy period (as long as two months) required for the GoS to properly register and plate Post's official and personal vehicles. The OFM practice of registering vehicles within one day was described. The Spanish seemed genuinely surprised by the news that there has been such a long delay in the processing of vehicle registrations. They quickly agreed that even a one month delay is unacceptable, and they assured the US side that this issue would be promptly addressed. Post will provide a list of the outstanding registrations so that action can be taken immediately. The Spanish side expressed regret that, given the bureaucratic limitation of the Spanish system, the efficiency of OFM could not be matched, but agreed that improvements can be achieved. The Spanish explained a new initiative underway to make the registration process web-based. In theory, this will allow for a more efficient and smoother process. 6. In addition to the registration issue, the issuance of cover license plates for security purposes was addressed. Currently, the GoS will provide only one cover plate for each US Mission family. This action forces family members to decide which vehicle and passengers remain a soft-target for terrorist actions. DAS made a strong appeal for the issuance of cover plates to all members of Post without limitation. The Director General of Protocol agreed that providing only one cover plate per family provided little benefit of security for a diplomatic family. He recounted his personal experience as a terrorist target while he was serving outside Spain and how the lack of cover plates negatively affected him and his family. He promised that action would be taken to address both the registration and licensing of vehicles. 7. As a final note, DAS requested an update on the situation concerning the seizure of Post's official VAT reimbursements due to judicial action. The Spanish expressed their concern over several court decisions to seize USG's VAT refunds. They noted that in some cases the Spanish State Attorneys had been denied participation to appeal and defend the non-attachability of the USG's VAT refunds. They also pointed out that there is no law in Spain that addresses the immunity of a Foreign Sovereigns assets and that some Spanish judges tend to uphold the basic fundamental rights of citizens when these conflict with diplomatic immunity. They reiterated that the MFA shared the USG's position and arguments on this issue and, as explained above, Spanish law does not clearly define the extent of diplomatic immunity, which leaves such matters open to judicial interpretation. The MFA representative from its Legal Department expressed some optimism that a possible pending U.N. resolution may provide assistance in this matter, however others on the panel expressed privately that this position may be overly optimistic. ARGYROS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04