Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04MANAMA322 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04MANAMA322 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Manama |
| Created: | 2004-03-10 07:18:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL KJUS KTIA BA KICC |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L MANAMA 000322 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/09/2014 TAGS: PREL, KJUS, KTIA, BA, KICC SUBJECT: NO SIGN OF MOVEMENT ON ARTICLE 98 RATIFICATION REF: KANESHIRO - FORD EMAIL OF MARCH 9 Classified By: Charge Robert S. Ford. Reasons 1.4 (D). 1. (C) Charge asked Bahraini MFA Minister of State on March 8 and the Foreign Minister on March 9 whether the GoB had determined how it wanted to move forward with implementing our signed Article 98 agreement. The Minister of State said the MFA lawyers still have not determined what legal means are available. The MinState said the GoB wanted to be very careful not to create unnecessary issues with the Parliament. Charge noted that the MFA's legal team had been examining this question since last summer. He asked when we could expect a response given our anxious desire to finish the steps to implementing the agreement. The MinState declined to give a date but emphasized that under no circumstances would the Bahraini Government ever transfer an American servicemember to the International Criminal Court. The FM March 9 also declined to give Charge a sense of when the GoB would tell us when it would finish its procedures. He merely said we would hear back soon. 2. (C) Comment: It is extremely unlikely that the GoB would transfer an American servicemember to the ICC or a third party; the bilateral military relationship is absolutely essential to Bahrain's security. That said, it seems unlikely that we will, in fact, hear back soon about bringing the Article 98 formally into effect. It is possible that the MFA lawyers think the agreement should go to Parliament, and the GoB doesn't want to send it given how feisty the Parliament has been on other issues. It also is possible that the MFA lawyers are studying the question to death. In any case, we could remain in this holding pattern for a long time. Charge called on the Foreign Minister by coincidence on the same day that NEA PDAS Larocco raised this subject with the Bahraini Ambassador in Washington. We will press the MFA in a couple weeks to learn if the GOB has made a decision to bring the signed Article 98 agreement into force. If they still have not, we would then recommend that (a) we provide a letter from the appropriately senior American official that we could deliver to the Foreign Minister, or (b) a higher level American official convoke the Bahraini ambassador in Washington to underline the urgency to the USG. FORD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04