Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04TELAVIV1464 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04TELAVIV1464 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Tel Aviv |
| Created: | 2004-03-09 11:15:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ETRD BEXP ECON IS ECONOMY AND FINANCE U |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L TEL AVIV 001464 SIPDIS DEPT FOR NEA/IPA, EB DEPT PASS TO USTR CNOVELLI AND ESAUMS USDOC FOR 500/KJUSTER/AKUNTAMUKKALA USDOC FOR 4520/CLOUSTANAU/TSAMS/NWEIGLER USDOC FOR 3131/BORR/GLITMAN E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/09/2014 TAGS: ETRD, BEXP, ECON, IS, ECONOMY AND FINANCE, U.S.-ISRAEL RELATIONS SUBJECT: USING THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE TO PROMOTE OUR TRADE AGENDA WITH ISRAEL Classified By: Ambassador Daniel C. Kurtzer, Reasons: 1.4(B) and (D) From Ambassador Kurtzer to Assistant U.S. Trade Representative Cathy Novelli. 1. (C) I encourage Washington to convene a meeting of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) as soon as possible. Our combined efforts to focus Israel on our trade and investment concerns are beginning to pay dividends. A new agricultural agreement that will increase access to U.S. agricultural products is a concrete result. The GOI may also finally recognize that it cannot avoid tackling the contentious issue of pharmaceutical data protection. Recent visits by Under Secretaries of State, Commerce and Treasury all drove home SIPDIS the importance of dealing with the trade deficit and taking action on IPR, procurement practices, and the use of technical standards as non-tariff barriers. The GOI is getting the message, not only from the USG here and in Washington, but also from the U.S. private sector via the AmCham's forum of U.S. companies in Israel and its four subcommittees which are pressing on all these issues. I will be meeting Minister of Industry and Trade Olmert next week, at his request, to consider ways to solve some of these problems. 2. (C) A JEC meeting would allow us to capitalize on this momentum, perhaps bring to closure some issues where we've begun to see movement, and to further press on longstanding concerns that the GOI has failed to adequately address. Issues that need to be discussed include: --An Israeli technical standards regime that often favors European firms over American suppliers; --Lack of transparency and poor procedures in government and para-statal procurement that make it very difficult for U.S. firms to have a fair shot at contracts; --Israel's failure to clarify how it intends to deal with the data protection issue; and --The GOI's apparent intention to deny national treatment to U.S. recording companies under its new copyright law. This could easily erupt into a serious bilateral dispute. 3. (C) The GOI hopes to get something in return for any improvements it offers. The GOI fears that our new FTAs with other trading partners will mean their exports will face intensified competition in the U.S. market. In an effort to strengthen its position vis--vis our new FTA partners, Israel would like to latch onto these agreements through favorable rules-of-origin treatment. We expect the GOI to broach this issue whenever we raise our trade concerns. A JEC meeting now will allow us to frame the parameters of the discussion, and keep us on the offensive. 4. (C) Identical, coordinated messages from both Washington and Embassy have been key to getting the GOI to understand the seriousness of USG concerns. The JEC will allow us to reinforce the message that Washington and Tel Aviv are speaking with one unified voice on trade matters, and will strengthen the value of all USG messages on trade, whether delivered in Washington or in Israel. 5. (C) The last meeting of the JEC took place in 2001. Our trade agenda is now sufficiently full, and thus the time is now ripe to proceed with one of the most important JECs in recent memory. We look forward to continuing the productive cooperation that has brought us this far, and we stand ready to assist in the preparation of a JEC meeting on short notice. ********************************************* ******************** Visit Embassy Tel Aviv's Classified Website: http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/telaviv You can also access this site through the State Department's Classified SIPRNET website. ********************************************* ******************** KURTZER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04