Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04VATICAN886 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04VATICAN886 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Vatican |
| Created: | 2004-03-05 16:47:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PREL PHUM SOCI VT UN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS VATICAN 000886 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT. FOR EUR/WE (Levin); DRL/MLA (Butler, Sorensen); IO/SHA (Bracken); OES/IHA; L/UNA E.O. 12958 N/A TAGS: PREL, PHUM, SOCI, VT, UN SUBJECT: VATICAN OPPOSED TO BRAZILIAN SEXUAL ORIENTATION RESOLUTION 1.(SBU) Reasoning that people "who could be victims of discrimination on the basis of their 'sexual orientation' are already protected by international frameworks currently in force," the Holy See signaled its opposition to CHR-60, the Brazilian resolution on sexual orientation. A note verbale delivered to the Embassy March 4 (French text faxed to EUR/WE) warned that the resolution seemed to be "a preliminary step forward for legitimizing the claim of certain homosexual persons to marriage and the adoption of children." The Vatican emphasized that its position on the issue was "by no means intended to...support discrimination against homosexual persons," but instead meant to safeguard human dignity and the family, "founded on marriage between a man and a woman." An accompanying non-paper (also faxed to EUR/WE) said that the resolution would "clash with legal systems, with the culture, and religious traditions of the vast majority of member countries of the United Nations." 2. (SBU) In its non-paper, the Holy See asserted that the resolution was aimed not so much at protection from discrimination as at the promotion of 'sexual orientation' as an interpretive tool of human rights." Further, according to the Holy See, the lack of an "agreed definition of 'sexual orientation' in any consensually accepted instrument" of the U.N. was problematic. "Were the proposed resolution to be in fact introduced," the non- paper continued, "it should use only 'UN agreed language,' should be limited to encouraging the application of the existing international law on non-discrimination, and should not require...new studies or comments with a view to modifying international legislation on non-discrimination." 3. (SBU) Begin text of unofficial English translation of note verbale: The Secretary of State, Section for the Relations with the States, extends its regards to the U.S. Embassy to the Holy See and the honor of making reference to the project of Resolution related to human rights and "sexual orientation," which was introduced in 2003, during the 59th session of the Human Rights Commission of the United Nations. As is known, lack of time and strong opposition met this project, and the Commission decided to propose its examination during the 60th session which will be held in Geneva, from March 15 to April 23, 2004. The Secretary of State has the honor of communicating the following related to this project which, in 2004, is currently in the agenda (order of the day) relating to discrimination: 1) The Holy See enters into partnership with the countries opposed to this project. For the first time, at the heart of the United Nations, a Resolution will include "sexual orientation" among the causes of discrimination. According to this idea which is voluntarily undefined, this Resolution seems to be a preliminary step forward for legitimizing the claim of certain homosexual persons access to marriage and the adoption of children. 2) As one can read in the note attached, from the legal perspective, this project goes beyond the actual international norms related to human rights as well as almost all national legislation. The persons who could be victims of discrimination, on the basis of their "sexual orientation," are already protected by the international frameworks already in force. 3) One does not then see how one can include "sexual orientation" among the causes of discrimination. The approval of this project will require from the rest a precedent in favor of those who seek to push/force the norms in force. Although certain documents of regional Groups consider the same orientation a cause of discrimination, one can not see in this Resolution project in question that it will be held to conform to those documents. 4) The present considerations of the Holy See are by no means intended to impose a view of faith, nor support discrimination towards homosexual persons, but only to offer an impartial service to the international community, to better guarantee the dignity of all human beings and the family, founded on marriage between a man and a woman. The Secretary of State takes this opportunity to again offer to the US. Embassy to the Holy See the assurance of its highest esteem. From the Vatican, 2 March 2004 End text of note verbale. Nicholson n NNNN 2004VATICA00886 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04