Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04HOCHIMINHCITY196 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04HOCHIMINHCITY196 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Consulate Ho Chi Minh City |
| Created: | 2004-02-26 13:02:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PHUM KWMN SOCI PGOV SMIG VM TIP |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HO CHI MINH CITY 000196 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT FOR EAP/BCLTV, G/TIP, DRL E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PHUM, KWMN, SOCI, PGOV, SMIG, VM, TIP SUBJECT: TRAFFICKING RETURNEES IN AN GIANG UPDATE REF: 03 Hanoi 001671 1. (SBU) SUMMARY. An Giang province's program to help trafficking returnees resettle has met with mixed success, according to provincial officials. The NGO-supported project, working in conjunction with the provincial Women's Union and the Ho Chi Minh City-based Little Rose Shelter, has so far assisted 29 girls aged 11 to 17 from the border province who had been or have a high risk of being trafficked to Cambodia. Officials from the An Giang Department of Labor, Invalids, and Social Affairs (Dolisa) also claimed that trafficking has been significantly reduced in the province. Poloff was unable to meet with trafficking returnees in the province, although Pol/Econ FSN assistant was able to talk with two victims at the Little Rose Shelter. END SUMMARY. 2. (SBU) The returnee project, done in conjunction with the International Organization for Migration (IOM), targeted An Giang "girls" (so far victims have ranged from 11 to 17 years old) who had been or have a high risk of being trafficked to neighboring Cambodia. IOM may expand the project to include other border provinces, like Tay Ninh. This project follows an IOM-sponsored program to train local officials to identify and locate trafficking returnees (reftel). Victims receive four months of psychological counseling and vocational training (sewing) at the Little Rose Shelter, plus US$50 of start-up money upon their return to An Giang province. The first group of fifteen victims returned to the province in 2003, while a second group of fourteen victims completed the returnee program on February 25, 2004. Most of the victims were initially trafficked for labor and worked in "cafes" in Cambodia. Both provincial and shelter officials admitted, however, that many actually worked in the sex industry. A third group of fourteen victims from the province arrived at the shelter in Ho Chi Minh City on February 24. 3. (SBU) Provincial officials initially claimed that the program had been a success for "most" women, including five who had married since their return. When asked how many were not successful, officials stated that only 50 percent had "stabilized" and found jobs, but none had returned to the sex industry. Shelter officials, however, reported that two girls from the initial group had gone back to sex work. One girl from the second group also dropped out of the program before completing the counseling and training. The Women's Union representative stated that victims did not face much discrimination upon returning to their villages. Neighbors looked on them with "sympathy" and saw them as "victims." According to the Women's Union rep, discriminating against victims is not part of Vietnamese culture. 4. (SBU) Other provincial programs, funded by the GVN, IOM, and the German NGO Teres Dez Home, include micro-credit lending for victims or families of victims, vocational training and scholarships for the poor and other high-risk groups, community- based education, clubs to "advocate for the prevention of prostitution, drugs, and HIV/AIDS," and seminars to discuss trafficking issues. Many of these programs have been operational for one to three years. 5. (SBU) Dolisa officials repeatedly stated trafficking was a "police matter." In 2003 only five "complaints" had been brought to the police, down from "tens of complaints" the year before. They cited this as evidence that community awareness programs were working. All "complaints" lodged in 2003 were dropped for lack of evidence. Little Rose Shelter officials reported, however, that after the first group of victims returned, the province claimed it had no more cases. When two HCMC-based social workers visited communes recommended by participants in the first group, the social workers discovered many more cases that local/commune officials had been unwilling to report. Shelter officials attributed this to a concern that, if small hamlets admitted to a trafficking problem, they would lose their status as "cultural villages." (Post Note: This is an honorific that means, inter alia, the community has no "social evils.") Shelter officials did not know if this tendency to hide cases was supported at the hamlet or commune level. An Giang Dolisa officials gave vague statements about the number of returnees in the province overall, ultimately admitting they were not aware of, or could not control, most cases. They only knew of victims who had returned through "diplomatic" channels. Officials also reported that HIV/AIDS was "not a wide problem" with returnees, citing only "one or two" cases, none recent. (Post Note: HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment does not fall under Dolisa's purview in this province.) 6. (SBU) Poloff's requests to meet with returnees in the province were denied. Women's Union officials said they might be able to arrange something in the future, but needed advance notice to prepare and brief the returnees for meeting with a foreigner and to arrange a discreet meeting place. According to the Women's Union, the presence of a foreigner in their villages would cause hardship and discrimination for the returnees. Officials from An Giang province, IOM, and the Little Rose Shelter all stated this was "a very sensitive" issue to be sharing with foreigners. (Post Note: It was unclear how much of this concern reflected a genuine effort to protect the victims from embarrassment/shunning, and how much reflected an effort to avoid unwanted negative attention for the villages and province as a whole.) 7. (SBU) Pol/Econ FSN assistant was able to interview two victims from neighboring hamlets in the second group at the Little Rose Shelter in Ho Chi Minh City. They both said they were very happy to be in the program. Nguyen Thi Anh Trang (protect), age 15, was recruited by a friend to go work as a babysitter and laundress in Cambodia to help pay off her family's debts. She ultimately worked in a cafe owned by a friend of her first "lord." Her friend was sold to another individua nd kled afew months later. After nine months of mistreatment, Trang learned of her friend's death and decided to escape. She walked across the border during the night and made her way to her aunt's house. Her aunt referred her to the Women's Union. Tran Thi Ngoc Nho (protect), also age 15 and from a poor family, was "lured" by another girl, 4-5 years older than she, to work in Cambodia as a babysitter and dishwasher. The recruiter then left her and she wound up working in a cafe. Because she was treated badly, she decided to return home. Nho's mother then went to Cambodia to try to claim Nho's salary from the cafe owner, but he refused to pay. When the Pol/Econ FSN later returned to the shelter, she witnessed the arrival of the third group, who were brought there by a representative of the An Giang Women's Union, Miss Hiem. The second group immediately ran over to Miss Hiem, surrounded her and cheered. The Pol/Econ FSN noted the atmosphere overall was very warm and welcoming. 8. (SBU) COMMENT: Without additional information, ConGen cannot come to any general conclusion about the overall long-term success of the programs or the treatment of returnees in their villages. It was hard to pin down precise details about victims or programs, even though the first-hand anecdotal evidence seemed genuine. Some Vietnamese officials seemed in denial about the magnitude of the issue. Whether this was because officials were unwilling to share information about this "very sensitive issue" with a foreign diplomat or because they do not have reliable statistics could not be determined. The existence of a variety of programs focused on trafficking victims and public awareness suggests that An Giang province is taking some concrete steps to address trafficking, but the jury is still out on their effectiveness. YAMAUCHI
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04