Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04FRANKFURT1495 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04FRANKFURT1495 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Consulate Frankfurt |
| Created: | 2004-02-25 09:26:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV MASS PREL GM |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 FRANKFURT 001495 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, MASS, PREL, GM SUBJECT: Rheinland-Pfalz Lobbies for U.S. Troops to Stay REF: A) 03 STATE 327580, B) Frankfurt-EUR/AGS email 19Feb04 SUMMARY ------- 1. (SBU) Concerned over the USG Global Posture Review (ref A), the state of Rheinland-Pfalz (R-P) is fighting hard to hang on to the approximately 24,000 active-duty U.S. soldiers stationed within the state. Home to US Air Force Europe (USAFE) headquarters at Ramstein Airbase as well as the airbase at Spangdahlem and Army bases at Baumholder and Pirmasens, the U.S. military is one of Rheinland-Pfalz's largest employers. Despite assurances that the upcoming decision will be based on strategic considerations, R-P leaders are looking for "carrots" to convince the USG to retain a sizable presence in SW Germany. Press coverage and speculation on possible outcomes continue to raise anxiety levels. END SUMMARY. R-P Takes Advantage of Congressional Staff Visit to Make Case For Basing --------------------------------------------- ---- 2. (SBU) In reaction to the President's November announcement that the USG will review stationing of forces worldwide (ref A), Rheinland-Pfalz has initiated a lobbying campaign with the goal of maintaining current troop strength. The state sent a delegation to Washington in late 2003, held extensive meetings with USAFE and USAREUR (US Army Europe, in Heidelberg) and recently sponsored the visit of a group of congressional staffers to discuss the future of the U.S. military in Germany (organized by a German-American NGO, the Hanseatic Institute). During the three-day program, staffers met with state and local officials and toured U.S. bases and the city of Kaiserslautern (home to the largest overseas American military community in the world) before traveling to Bamberg and Berlin, where they met with representatives of the MFA, MOD and Chancellery. 3. (SBU) In their briefing to Congressional staffers (attended by Pol/Econ rep), R-P Interior Ministry officials previewed an "incentives package" they will soon submit to the USG. The package highlights the state's receptive attitude towards the U.S. military presence and proposes economic inducements designed to make basing more affordable. Rheinland-Pfalz officials also announced that a high-level delegation will visit Washington on March 23- 24 to engage decision-makers on the issue. The German Embassy in Washington will coordinate the program. 4. (SBU) The incentives package's focus is a public-private initiative to build new military housing, with public land to be donated by the state and federal governments providing land (either free or at reduced cost), and construction supplied by a private developer (as yet unnamed). Under the proposed arrangement (along the lines of the Residential Communities Initiative within the U.S.), the developer would lease the new developments to the U.S. military, providing new housing and related facilities (community center, pre-schools) without requiring the U.S. military to pay for construction up front. NOTE: Staffers pointed out that the RCI program in the U.S. involves long- term leases (up to 50 years), and questioned whether Rheinland-Pfalz would be able to secure private financing given the shorter time horizon of overseas bases. END NOTE. COMMENT ------- 5. (SBU) R-P officials continue to press their case despite USG assurances that the basing review is neither connected to recent disagreements over Iraq nor subject to influence through lobbying. R-P officials fear the state's rural economy will not be able to recover from massive troop reductions in the same way that Bavaria, a state with a larger and more diverse infrastructure, could, especially given Germany's long-term economic stagnation. In the absence of a final decision, R-P officials have targeted their lobbying efforts to respond to recent "insider reports" (in Stars and Stripes, Wall Street Journal, and Handelsblatt) on timetables and numbers of troop reductions in Germany, despite the absence of any confirmation of these reports through official channels. 6. (SBU) R-P officials claim to be confident that Ramstein will remain largely intact in the upcoming review but worry about other bases in the area, particularly Baumholder (13,000 troops) and Spangdahlem (5,000). CG and EUCOM Deputy Commander General Charles Wald are scheduled to meet with Rheinland-Pfalz Minister-President Kurt Beck (SPD Social Democrat) in April to follow up on U/S Grossman's consultations in Berlin. In the interim, we expect lobbying efforts to remain intense Rheinland-Pfalz feels that it has nothing to gain and everything to lose by sitting on the sidelines as the process unfolds. END COMMENT. PASI
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04