Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ABUJA315 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ABUJA315 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Abuja |
| Created: | 2004-02-24 13:33:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ECON TBIO EAGR KPAO NI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 241333Z Feb 04
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ABUJA 000315 SIPDIS STATE FOR EB/TPP/ABT/BTT FOR DEBORAH MALAC, JACK BOBO LAGOS FOR PAS, EB AND FAS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, TBIO, EAGR, KPAO, NI SUBJECT: NIGERIA AND BIOTECHNOLOGY PUBLIC DIPLOMACY REFTEL: STATE 15050 1. Summary. The U.S. Mission in Nigeria would like to propose several projects to expand biotechnology awareness and acceptance in Nigeria; all are consistent with the Mission's biotechnology collaborative efforts with the National Agency for Biotechnology Development and Assistance (NABDA) and broader USG objectives in the sector of economic development. We propose three workshops for legislators, government officials, and journalists in Nigeria and a press tour in the United States for Nigerian journalists. Total financing requested is $110,000. End Summary. Biotechnology and Nigeria ------------------------- 2. The U.S. Mission's proposal for biotechnology aims at dispelling the false impressions many Nigerians have regarding biotechnology and the safety of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) by helping a broad cross-section of government officials, members of parliament, and the media better understand the benefits of biotechnology. Nigerians have learned about GMOs primarily as a result of the U.S.-European debate over GMOs and packaging requirements. The issues of GMO safety for human consumption as well as their possible threat to local environmental diversity are issues that have received treatment in the Nigerian press, and ones that could easily retard acceptance of GMOs by Nigerian farmers. Nigerian journalists who have participated in mission programs on biotechnology as well as officials of the Nigerian Agency for Biotechnology Development and Assistance (NABDA) have suggested that anti-Western elements may latch onto biotechnology and unnecessarily raise people's fears. Nigerian audiences, based on their comparatively lower educational levels than in the U.S., are less conversant in scientific matters in general, let alone biotechnology. The Internet is very popular in Nigeria, but Internet material is often used to misinform - as much as inform - public debate. Nigerian officials and other supporters of biotechnology require training and further information in order to explain biotechnology to the Nigerian public as well as promote acceptance. 3. Nigeria is poised to take advantage of the potential of biotechnology to improve agricultural productivity because it has a supportive national biotechnology policy, a biosafety framework, and the scientific capacity to conduct and apply biotechnology research. There exist already strong linkages with a number of U.S.-based institutions. USAID/Nigeria is assisting Nigeria in developing its biotechnology capacity through technical training to members of the National Biosafety Committee, establishing collaborative research projects with Ahmadu Bello University, National Root Crops Research Institute and other key Nigerian research institutes, and providing balanced information on biotechnology to policy makers, the public and other key stakeholders. The research goal of the Nigeria project is to develop insect-resistant cowpea, which would eliminate the need for farmers to apply pesticides, and increase the yield of this staple food crop by 5-10 times. The project is scheduled to debut in April 2004, but already anti-GMO groups have been speaking out in Nigeria. U.S. Mission Proposal --------------------- 4. Biotechnology research in Nigeria is coordinated through the NABDA, and USAID's program receives oversight and support from a steering/advisory committee chaired by NABDA and comprised of members of research and academic institutions, relevant ministries, and the U.S. Mission. On February 19, the steering committee met to discuss public awareness and education issues, and the urgent need to lay the groundwork for the introduction of the biotech form of cowpea. One of the first steps, however, is to train relevant segments of the Nigerian government who will be called upon to present biotechnology and explain its benefits to the public. To this end, three workshops are proposed: -- A series of workshops/seminars for elected officials at the Federal and State levels; i.e., National Assembly members as well as State Assembly members, plus members of the key ministries involved in biotechnology. We envision about two weeks of programming (two- or three-day programs) to cover approximately 200 people. Trainers from the U.S. might include a biotechnology resource person (academic researcher), a staff member of a U.S. state assembly who could explain how constituents' concerns are handled in the U.S. where biotechnology is concerned, and a public policy specialist who can advise on strategies to assist Nigerian elected officials in the public policy debate over biotechnology in Nigeria. Estimated cost: $35,000 -- A series of workshops to enhance the capability of ministry, NABDA, NAFDAC (Nigerian equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) university, and other keys spokespersons to deal with the press and NGOs on the subject of biotechnology. We envision approximately ten days programming (four-day sessions) to include approximately 40 people. Trainers might include a public affairs member of the FDA, a representative from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and a media specialist who can provide the journalists' perspective. A key element of the workshop will be for participants to give mock press conferences and be critiqued for their presentations and ability to respond to questions. Estimated cost: $25,000 -- A third workshop will focus on journalists and training for the media. Nigeria has an incredibly large and diverse pool of journalists covering television, radio and print. We would like to do four workshops outside Abuja and Lagos to provide training to many of the state and regional media personnel who will be handling biotechnology reporting as it is introduced to farmers in the rural areas. We envision two to three weeks of programming (two- to three-day programs) to cover roughly 80 people. A trainer could be a journalism professor or another expert conversant in biotechnology issues. Estimated cost: $10,000 -- A tour for six Nigerian media participants to visit the United States for a thorough introduction to biotechnology. A tour might include stops in Washington, D.C., St. Louis, MO (Monsanto and the Danforth Institute), Cornell or Tuskegee University, etc. Estimated cost: $40,000 5. Nigeria can benefit greatly from biotechnology. Formerly a net food exporter within the West African region, Nigeria now imports food, including basic staples such as rice. Lack of investment in the agricultural sector by successive governments has left Nigeria with a still rudimentary system of subsistence agriculture, with most farmers unable to afford fertilizer and improved seeds. The Nigerian government anticipates that biotechnology may help to jumpstart Nigeria's neglected agricultural sector to not only feed Nigeria but also become once again the bread basket of West Africa by enhancing food security in the region. However, Nigeria's farmers as well as the general public will need to be educated on the benefits of biotechnology, and the Nigerian government requires assistance in taking the lead. Nigeria threw off decades of military rule in 1999, but vestiges of authoritarian practices are still evident throughout the political system. Nigerian officials, many of whom served under military leaders, are not used to engaging the public and defending policy choices. The proposed workshops will go far to ensuring they can adequately defend the inevitable charges that this is a dangerous USG initiative forced upon the Nigerian public. Nigerian journalists also require training so they will have a basic grounding in the facts regarding biotechnology and will not easily be misled by the vast amount of negative material that is available on the Internet. The U.S. Mission appreciates EB consideration of its proposal at a very critical time for biotechnology efforts in Nigeria. ROBERTS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04