Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ANKARA920 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ANKARA920 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2004-02-18 06:16:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL MARR MOPS TU AF |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000920 SIPDIS DEPT FOR AFGHANISTAN COORDINATOR TAYLOR, SA, EUR/SE, EUR/RPM E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/30/2013 TAGS: PREL, MARR, MOPS, TU, AF SUBJECT: AFGHANISTAN: TURKS NEARING DECISION ON PRTS; INABILITY TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON OUR COMMITMENT ON TU HELOS FOR ISAF MAY IMPACT FUTURE TU CONTRIBUTIONS (U) Classified by DCM Robert Deutsch. Reasons: 1.5 (B and D). ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (C) MFA and TGS agree in principle that Turkey should lead a Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Afghanistan. They intend to finalize their discussions by February 18 and seek the Prime Minister's backing (both political and financial) for Turkey to lead a PRT. If the PM concurs, the GOT intends to approach us to discuss desired location of the PRT and when Turkey may be able to stand it up. While their focus remains on PRTs, the MFA and TGS continue to discuss in general terms whether Turkey should increase its contribution to ISAF and/or contribute to OEF operations. At the same time, however, our contacts have cautioned us that the USG's inability to follow through on its commitment to take care of the airlift required to transport the Turkish helicopters to Afghanistan for ISAF may adversely impact Turkey's willingness to do more in Afghanistan. The GOT remains interested in holding consultations in Ankara with Afghanistan Coordinator Taylor and has proposed three alternative dates in mid-March. We request a response. End summary. 2. (C) During a February 13 meeting, MFA DDG for South Asian Affairs Aydin Evergin offered to deputy pol-mil counselor the following information on Afghanistan-related issues: ----------------- DEFENSE INFORMALS ----------------- --Minister of Defense Gonul told SECDEF and the other Allies during the Defense Informals earlier this month in Germany that Turkey was considering making a contribution to Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan, including possibly leading one. The press reports after the Informals (which reported that Turkey had announced it would lead a PRT) "were wrong." --------------------------------- PRTS: TURKEY CLOSE TO A DECISION --------------------------------- --On February 18, the MFA, TGS and other Turkish agencies will meet to finalize their deliberations on whether Turkey should lead a PRT. The expected result: a recommendation to the Prime Minister that he back (both politically and financially) Turkey leading a PRT. TGS tells the MFA that it does not have the resources in its current operating budget to finance a PRT. --If the PM concurs, the GOT will approach us to discuss desired location of a Turkish-led PRT and when the Turks might be able to stand up the PRT. (The MFA and TGS have some proposed locations in mind, but when pressed, Evergin declined to discuss specifics.) The MFA and TGS also want to send a team to Afghanistan to observe existing US-led PRTs and to "pick the brains" of US personnel assigned there. ---------------------------- TURKISH HELICOPTERS FOR ISAF ---------------------------- --The Turkish military is anxious to resolve the issue of who will provide the airlift for the three helicopters that Turkey has offered to backfill ISAF requirements. NATO is pressing the Turks to send the helicopters. --US military officials told their Turkish counterparts the US would provide the airlift. (Note: this may be a reference to a statement made by VCJCS GEN. Pace during his early December visit to Ankara, when he told TGS D/CHOD GEN. Basbug "you provide the helos, we will take care of the lift." After deputy pol-mil counselor's discussion with the MFA's Evergin, MFA and MOD officials claimed to the DATT that SECDEF had told MOD Gonul at the December NATO Informal that Turkey would not have to pay for the airlift for the Turkish helos to ISAF. The Turkish officials went on to say that they recommended to TGS and MFA that the GOT support the helo request based on that understanding. End note.) --The GOT believes it has done its part by responding positively to the USG's request and offering the helicopters. It is now waiting for the US to do its part. --The Turkish military is not pleased with recent suggestions by some Allies that Turkey now provide its own lift. --The USG's apparent inability to follow through on its commitment on the airlift may impact adversely the GOT's decision whether to make further contributions to Afghanistan. (Note: MFA and MND officials told DATT separately that the MFA and MND are prepared to recommend that Turkey lead a PRT if the ISAF helo airlift support issue can be resolved to Turkey's satisfaction. End note.) ------------------------------------ OTHER POSSIBLE TURKISH CONTRIBUTIONS ------------------------------------ --Turks are aware the US and NATO are interested in having Turkey do more in Afghanistan. --The MFA and TGS are discussing in general terms whether Turkey can or should do more in the way of support for OEF or ISAF. Turkey's present focus is on PRTs. --Turkey is not clear on the US priority in Afghanistan. Is it PRTs? OEF? ISAF? ------------------------------------ CONSULTATIONS WITH AMBASSADOR TAYLOR ------------------------------------ --The GOT remains interested in convening formal consultations in Ankara with Afghanistan Coordinator Taylor. --Turks would like to discuss the following issues: OEF, ISAF, PRTs, reconstruction, political/economic developments in Afghanistan, Bonn meeting. It is especially important to have the "right" US military officials accompany Ambassador Taylor to discuss PRT, OEF and ISAF operations in detail and to answer any questions/address any concerns the Turkish military may have. --In response to the request from the US for acceptable dates in mid-March, the MFA proposes the following dates: March 11, 12, or 19. 3. (C) Action request: we request that the Department advise when Ambassador Taylor might be able to travel to Ankara for consultations. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04