Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ROME563 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ROME563 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2004-02-13 16:41:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | EAGR TBIO ETRD EU IT ITALIAN POLITICS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 000563 SIPDIS STATE FOR EUR/ERA, EUR/UBI, EB/TPP/ABT/DMALAC USTR FOR JIM MURPHY USDA/FAS-BIOTECH GROUP - E. JONES MILAN FOR PRINCIPAL OFFICER FLORENCE FOR PRINCIPAL OFFICER NAPLES FOR PRINCIPAL OFFICER SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EAGR, TBIO, ETRD, EU, IT, ITALIAN POLITICS SUBJECT: ITALIAN BIOTECH POLICY IN DISARRAY; LITTLE HOPE OF GOI SUPPORT FOR NK603 1. SUMMARY. Italian biotech policy and policy-making appears to growing less transparent and more confused. The NK603 dossier is only the latest example. The Embassy believes it is unlikely that a Feb 17 GOI interagency meeting of technical experts will develop a consensus view. In our estimation, the best we can expect at the Feb. 18 meeting of member states in Brussels is another Italian abstention. END SUMMARY. 2. Embassy discussions with the Ministries of Environment, Agriculture, Health and Productive Activities reveal a GOI in disarray on biotech. This is particularly true at the technical level, where the lines of responsibility seem to be moving. Contacts who are usually in the know no longer understand the chain of decision making or divisions of responsibility. For example, we have yet to identify the individual(s) responsible for implementing the traceability and labeling and food and feed directives despite repeated inquiries. Another example is the apparent decision to relocate the Biotech Advisory Group (National Committee on Biotech), currently under the Ministry of Health, to the Ministry of Environment. The move was previewed by contacts months ago when discussing how Italy will implement the traceability and labeling and food and feed directives. But the transition is apparently on hold awaiting the approval of Health Minister Sirchia and some sources anticipate a nasty fight before it's resolved. The long time Committee Chair retired and was replaced by someone due to retire in the next six months further confusing the situation. 3. At the political level, the Berlusconi cabinet remains as divided as ever over biotech policy. Publicly AgMinister Alemanno continues to hold center stage with his anti-biotech position. Environment Minister Matteoli and Health Minister Sirchia occasionally say something positive in the media about biotech, but their positive comments are soon forgotten by a suspicious public. Vice Minister for Productive Activities, Adolfo Urso, responsible for Foreign Trade, told the Ambassador yesterday that the EU is taking positive steps on biotech approvals, and that Italy's indecisiveness at least keeps it from voting against such measures. 4. Given this current state of affairs, we do not expect Italy to back approval of NK603 at the Feb 18 meeting in Brussels. A negative vote is possible, but our money is riding on another abstention as happened with BT-11 corn. Sembler NNNN 2004ROME00563 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04