Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04ANKARA801 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04ANKARA801 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2004-02-11 09:16:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ETRD EAGR KPAO TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 110916Z Feb 04
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 000801 SIPDIS STATE FOR EB/TPP/ABT/BTT DEBORA MALAC, JACK BOBO USDA FOR FAS/OA.BIG PAUL SPENCER USDA FOR FAS/ICD SEAN CARMEDY E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, EAGR, KPAO, TU SUBJECT: Biotechnology Outreach in Turkey Ref: State 15050 1. SUMMARY. TURKEY IS CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING REGULATIONS ON BIOTECHNOLOGY THAT COULD HAVE WIDE REPERCUSSIONS ON U.S. TRADE. MOREOVER, AS A FUTURE CANDIDATE FOR EU MEMBERSHIP, TURKEY'S ACCEPTANCE OF A LIBERAL POLICY ON THE USE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY MIGHT ALSO INFLUENCE EU POLICIES. POST, THEREFORE, BELIEVES THAT AN ACTIVE OUTREACH PROGRAM ON BIOTECHNOLOGY WOULD BE MOST USEFUL IN TURKEY. END SUMMARY. ----------------- CURRENT SITUATION ----------------- 2. THE CURRENT TURKISH GOVERNMENT HAS IDENTIFIED THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY LEGISLATION AS A PRIORITY. REGULATIONS THAT PARALLEL EU DIRECTIVES HAVE BEEN DRAFTED, HOWEVER NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN TO IMPLEMENT THEM. THERE ARE NO BIOTECH REGULATIONS THAT AFFECT TRADE IN TURKEY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CARTAGENA BIOSAFETY PROTOCOL THAT THE TURKISH PARLIAMENT RATIFIED IN 2003. THERE IS HOWEVER, A PROHIBITION ON PLANTING ANY BIOENGINEERED CROPS. THERE IS CONCERN THAT A SMALL NUMBER OF INFLUENTIAL OFFICIALS ARE SPREADING MISINFORMATION ABOUT THE SAFETY OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS DEVELOPED USING BIOTECHNOLOGY THAT WILL ULTIMATELY HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON CONSUMER PERCEPTION AND FUTURE LEGISLATION. ANNUALLY, THE UNITED STATES EXPORTS APPROXIMATELY USD 250 MILLION OF CORN AND SOYBEAN PRODUCTS FOR FEED, UP TO USD 100 MILLION OF CORN AND SOYBEAN OIL AND USD 200 - USD 300 MILLION OF COTTON TO TURKEY. THUS FAR, THERE ARE NO PROHIBITIVE LABELING REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCTS CONTAINING GENETICALLY MODIFIED INGREDIENTS. --------------------- OVERWHELMING RESPONSE --------------------- 3. POST HAS UTILIZED SEVERAL PROGRAMS TO CONDUCT BIOTECHNOLOGY OUTREACH ACTIVITIES OVER THE PAST YEAR. IN SEPTEMBER, FAS/ANAKARA RECRUITED SEVERAL PRO-BIOTECH EU SPEAKERS TO DISCUSS CURRENT POLICIES AND LEGISLATION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY IN ANKARA. ALTHOUGH ONLY 250 PEOPLE WERE INVITED TO ATTEND THE ALL-DAY SEMINAR, MORE THAN 400 PEOPLE REQUESTED INVITATIONS. ATTENDEES WERE PRIMARILY REGULATORS, UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE REQUESTED TRAINING AND ADDITIONAL SEMINARS ON THE ISSUE. TWO TURKISH REGULATORS HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED AND WILL BE PARTICIPATING IN THE INTERNATIONAL VISITORS PROGRAM THIS YEAR ON BIOTECHNOLOGY. THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE RECENTLY SENT A LIST OF 10 REGULATORS FOR TRAINING IN THE UNITED STATES ON FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 4. Many officials from the ministries of Agriculture and Health are privately supportive of biotechnology and the potential benefits the technology may hold for Turkish producers. However, many others - in key positions - are quite skeptical and misinformed and as a result are spreading misinformation about the safety of biotechnology to their colleagues and superiors. For example, after hearing a sound science-based presentation on the safety of bio-engineered foods from another scientist, a Turkish biologist responded that she would still never eat `those foods'. A general lack of information prevails. -------------------- PROPOSALS FOR TURKEY -------------------- 5. POST BELIEVES THAT A SPEAKER PROGRAM IN TURKEY WOULD BE MOST BENEFICIAL AND OUR FIRST PRIORITY. POST HAS A NUMBER OF CONTACTS IN DIFFERENT CITIES THAT WOULD BENEFIT AND APPRECIATE INFORMATION ON THE BENEFITS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE U.S. REGULATORY APPROACH TO THIS ISSUE. FAS/ANKARA HAS HAD OFFERS FROM RESEARCH INSTITUTES AND UNIVERSITIES TO HELP HOST SUCH EVENTS IN ANKARA AND IZMIR. THE SPEAKER PROGRAM WOULD ALSO ALLOW US TO REACH A GREATER NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS. 6. OUR SECOND PRIORITY WOULD BE TO HOST A GROUP OF REGULATORS/RESEARCHERS IN THE UNITED STATES EITHER IN A WORKSHOP OR TO MEET U.S. COUNTERPARTS ON THIS ISSUE. POST ALREADY HAS A LIST OF 10 PEOPLE SUBMITTED BY THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE FOR THE COCHRAN FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM. HOWEVER, INSUFFICIENT FUNDS WILL NOT ALLOW ALL OF THESE CANDIDATES TO PARTICIPATE. ADDITIONAL OFFICIALS FROM THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH WOULD ALSO BENEFIT FROM THIS TRAINING AND ESTABLISHING CONTACTS IN THE UNITED STATES. THESE CONTACTS COULD BE MOST BENEFICIAL IN HELPING TURKISH OFFICIALS RESPOND TO FUTURE QUESTIONS. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04