Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04RANGOON174 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04RANGOON174 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rangoon |
| Created: | 2004-02-09 06:05:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | EFIN ECON PGOV BM Economy |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000174 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE FOR EAP/BCLTV, EB COMMERCE FOR ITA JEAN KELLY TREASURY FOR OASIA JEFF NEIL E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EFIN, ECON, PGOV, BM, Economy SUBJECT: BURMA'S BANKS: THE YELLOW FLAG IS LIFTED REF: 03 RANGOON 1164 AND PREVIOUS 1. (SBU) Summary: After months of speculation and rumor the government has allowed three of the country's six biggest private banks to resume operations -- albeit under strict new regs and a promise to roll heads if there are any foul ups. Though some of the new regulations are sound, others are overly rigid and punitive. Likewise, the future of the country's two largest banks, not included in the liberalization, remains in limbo. Thus we are skeptical that the government's move will prime the pump and get large amounts of money flowing into the economy through the private banks. End summary. Don't Mess This Up 2. (SBU) With a stern warning to fly right this time, or else, the GOB on February 3 allowed three private banks to resume operations. The three banks, Kanbawza, Myanmar Universal, and Myanmar Oriental, were the third, fifth, and sixth of the "Big Six" banks (by deposit size). They have been inactive since the government effectively shuttered them following a disastrous run on private banks in February 2003. The three other large banks, two of which are under investigation for money laundering and ties to narcotrafficking, remain under wraps with no word as to their ultimate fate. Fourteen other very small private banks have been operating relatively freely for several months now, though without official government sanction. These small banks were not mentioned in the amnesty, though we expect them to continue their low level business. 3. (SBU) The decision to release the three banks has been rumored to be in the works for nearly six months now (see reftel) and it is unclear why the Bank Supervisory Committee, responsible for "resolving" the banking crisis, took so long to fire the starter's gun. The newly freed banks will be forced to abide by a long list of stringent new requirements, though, some of which were discussed previously (reftel) and some that are new. The New Law of the Land 4. (SBU) The new regulations aim to keep a bank from getting too large and powerful and to limit a customer's ability to quickly move money in and out of the banks. Some of the regs are quite responsible, but others may prove too rigid to allow profitable and customer-friendly banking. We are also disappointed to see the government has apparently not reformed its own arcane banking regulations, which, in part, encouraged the type of profligate lending and dealings that led to the crash in the first place. 5. (SBU) The regulations governing the three banks are as follows: -- (1) Deposits may not exceed seven times paid-up capital. If regulators find a violation of this, the bank must pay a fine equal to 2 percent of the excess amount; -- (2) Banks are no longer allowed to accept "hot money" call deposits (Note: these were very popular with banks, and depositors, as they offered an annual 4-10 percent interest rate, compounded daily, with no restrictions on withdrawals. End note.); -- (3) Savings account customers can make only one withdrawal and one deposit per week, though the amount is unlimited; -- (4) Fixed deposit terms are now three, six, nine, and twelve months. Prior to the crash the terms were one, two, three, and four weeks; -- (5) Interbank borrowing is prohibited; -- (6) Lending must be based on "strong" collateral (not further defined except to prohibit the use of gold and jewelry); -- (7) Banks may not lend to their own directors or directors' spouses or these people's affiliated companies; -- (8) Banks must appoint loan inspectors and "arrange to prosecute" those who fail to repay loans (Note: the government's responsibility in these areas is not clarified. End note.); -- (9) Banks may not offer credit card services; -- (10) Banks must maintain a liquidity ratio of at least 20 percent, a capital adequacy ratio of at least 10 percent, and a loan/deposit ratio of between 70 and 80 percent. These last requirements existed prior to the 2003 crash, but were poorly enforced. Comment: Banks Just Happy to Be Alive 6. (SBU) Bankers with whom we spoke were pleased to be allowed to resume their business no matter the new restrictions. However, when pressed they admitted they were not very optimistic that the new, more restrictive, environment would allow them to attract back the customers who fled during the crash and subsequent mishandling of the crisis by the government. In the first day after re-opening there were many customers -- to date prevented by government regulation from withdrawing more than 100,000 kyat per week ($115) -- who rushed in to clean out their accounts. On the macro level, we don't think the re-opening of these three banks will have much lubricating influence on the country's decrepit economy. Though included in the "Big Six," these banks held only a tiny percentage of the deposits and loans compared to the country's two largest, still embattled, banks -- Asia Wealth and Yoma. End comment. Martinez
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04