Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04SANTODOMINGO596 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04SANTODOMINGO596 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Santo Domingo |
| Created: | 2004-01-30 11:23:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECPS EFIN PREL EINV ECON DR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SANTO DOMINGO 000596 SIPDIS STATE FOR WHA AND EB PLEASE PASS TO USTR: S.CRONIN TREASURY FOR OASIS: R.TOLOUI AND L.LAMONICA SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECPS, EFIN, PREL, EINV, ECON, DR SUBJECT: TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES UNHAPPY WITH NEW PRESIDENTIAL DECREE TAXING SALES REVENUES 1. (SBU) Summary: Executives from three Dominican telecommunications companies, all with majority U.S. investment, briefed emboffs January 27 on a recent presidential decree they said effectively imposes a 10 percent tax on telecommunications companies' gross revenues. They asked for USG advocacy to repeal the tax and indicated they would probably appeal on constitutional grounds if the measure remained in effect. All four Dominican telecommunications companies are majority foreign-owned -- the fourth being French firm Orange. End Summary. 2. (SBU) Representatives of the three largest telecommunications companies in the Dominican Republic told emboffs on January 27 they had been informed on January 23 of a recent presidential decree imposing a ten percent tax on telecommunication company revenues. The firms are Codetel (Verizon), Centennial Dominicana (New Jersey-based Centennial Communications), and TriCom (Dominican company listed on NYSE; majority shares U.S.-owned). Prior to July 2002, telecommunications companies had been taxed on sales; a legal change at that time subjected them to the same tax procedures as other firms (1.5 percent tax on of sales, credited toward the eventual payment of a corporate income tax). The new decree -- decided without consultation and issued without advice to the affected firms -- is a step backward to that era. Executives noted that the sector was also recently hit with the temporary five percent export tax, even though, they argued, the net balance of their earnings is in pesos. 3. (SBU) The representatives asked for USG advocacy for repealing the decree. They based their argument on three main points: a) the GODR has singled out the telecom sector because of the majority foreign ownership; b) the decree was issued arbitrarily and in a manner that was not transparent (they received a letter last week from a mid-level tax authority official instructing them to begin payments in February); and c) the new tax on gross revenues completely alters their business plans, imposes a significant financial burden and negatively impacts their investment. 4. (SBU) All indicated that they were likely to cease investment in the Dominican Republic, given the uncertainty created in business conditions, unless the tax is repealed. Codetel representatives said that they had referred the issue to legal counsel for a decision whether to refuse payment while appealing the measure to the Supreme Court as unconstitutional. (The Court held in November that the 5 percent tax on exports, imposed by presidential decree, was invalid because all revenue measures must originate in the legislature; in December Congress approved the 5 percent tax as one of several measures to comply with an IMF agreement.) 5. (SBU) Comment: Telecom and energy are the two Dominican economic sectors with the most U.S. investment, and recently there has been little good to report about companies' experiences in either sector. Sectors with dollar earnings are attractive targets. The GODR is hard pressed for revenue and the president's one-line decree derogating a previous measure aims at raising the government take immediately. The GODR gave little consideration to the mid- term impact: the failure to consult and the completely unannounced reversion to the earlier, non-standard treatment warns any prospective investor that the GODR -- or at least the current administration -- is unpredictable at best. If the firms decide to petition the Supreme Court, in the midst of a presidential campaign, their high profile exercise will feed comment in the press and in the parties. 6. Embassy has asked for documentation and will seek additional clarification from the GODR. 7. This report was coordinated with USFCS Santo Domingo. HERTELL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04