Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 04COLOMBO155 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 04COLOMBO155 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Colombo |
| Created: | 2004-01-27 11:11:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV PTER EAID CE NO JA EU LTTE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 000155 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR D, SA, SA/INS, S/CT; NSC FOR E. MILLARD PLEASE ALSO PASS TOPEC E.O. 12958: DECL: 01-27-14 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PTER, EAID, CE, NO, JA, EU, LTTE - Peace Process, Political Parties SUBJECT: In readout, Japanese Ambassador sees visit by Special Envoy Akashi as net positive for peace process Refs: Colombo 150, and previous (U) Classified by Ambassador Jeffrey J. Lunstead. Reasons 1.5 (b,d). 1. (C) SUMMARY: On January 26, Japanese Ambassador Suda provided Ambassador Lunstead and the other local co-chairs of the Tokyo process with a readout of Special Envoy Akashi's recent visit to Sri Lanka. In Akashi's meeting with the LTTE, the group requested that more be done to funnel aid to the north/east. While concerned with the cohabitation confusion in the south, the Tigers indicated that they remained committed to the peace track. Akashi also met separately with both the President andtwice with the Prime Minister. Both principals indicated that they wanted to resolve the ongoing cohabitation impasse, but blamed the other for the situation. Suda thought that Akashi's visit was a net positive for the peace process. We agree and think that the visit helped set the stage for the meeting of the Tokyo co-chairs in Washington scheduled for February 17. END SUMMARY. 2. (C) Late January 26, Japanese Ambassador Akio Suda provided the local co-chairs of the Tokyo process with a readout of Special Envoy Yasushi Akashi's January 19-25 visit to Sri Lanka (see Reftel for review of the Tokyo followup meeting hosted by Akashi on January 23 in Colombo). The meeting was attended by Ambassador Lunstead, and representatives from Norway and the EU, including the Netherlands in its role as rotating president (Ireland does not have representation in Colombo). ----------------------- Akashi Meets the Tigers ----------------------- 3. (C) Suda kicked off with a review of Akashi's January 22 meeting with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) Political Chief S.P. Thamilchelvam. The meeting took place in the LTTE-controlled town of Kilinochchi in northern Sri Lanka. Suda said Thamilchelvam had expressed concerns that aid was not getting through to the north/east. Thamilchelvam had also expressed concern over political developments in the south. According to Suda, the Tiger official repeatedly stressed that the LTTE did not think political consensus would be reached in the south any time soon and said the Tigers were very skeptical that they could find a stable negotiating partner there at any point soon. Thamilchelvam reiterated, however, the LTTE's continuing commitment to the peace process and its position that the group would negotiate with anyone in the south who could take firm responsibility for peace negotiations. Akashi also asked Thamilchelvam to reconsider the LTTE's decision not to send a representative to the January 23 Tokyo followup meeting in Colombo. (Note: The Tigers were invited to the conference, but declined to attend.) Thamilchelvam expressed his appreciation for the invitation, but demurred, saying the situation was complicated, and due to a lack of political clarity in the south, the Tigers would not send a representative to the meeting. ------------------------ Meeting with Kumaratunga ------------------------ 4. (C) Suda reported that Akashi had briefed President Kumaratunga late January 23 on that day's Tokyo followup meeting. Akashi explained the donors' view that it was imperative that aid continue to flow on an island-wide basis in support of the peace process despite the lack of progress in peace negotiations. President Kumaratunga agreed with this strategy, noting that during earlier times of political uncertainty development work had gone forward. Kumaratunga expressed what Suda reported as "harsh" views toward the LTTE, lauding the U.S. Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) listing of the group. She also averred that "too much flexibility with the Tigers" would not be positive, citing the group's record on, among other things, child recruitment. 5. (C) Turning to the cohabitation crisis, Suda said Kumaratunga had reacted dismissively, noting that what others were calling a "crisis" had been in effect since the Prime Minister took power in December 2001. She asserted that there was a lack of communication with the PM that was his fault. Kumaratunga said she would like to resolve the cohabitation impasse, but that she felt she had done "all she could," and that the initiative to compromise was with the Prime Minister. Akashi urged her to be flexible and to work in the national interest toward a compromise with the PM. Kumaratunga said she would like the Prime Minister to proceed with the peace process, and claimed she would not interfere in his decisions. Wrapping up, Kumaratunga noted that she was not totally happy with the recent alliance between her Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and the radical Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), but that she had been "forced into it because of the Prime Minister." In a related vein, Suda said Akashi had also met with Opposition Leader and senior SLFP MP Mahinda Rajapakse, who was skeptical about how long the SLFP-JVP alliance would last. -------------------------------- Meetings with the Prime Minister -------------------------------- 6. (C) Suda noted that Akashi had met twice with Prime Minister Wickremesinghe, once on January 20 in Colombo, and again on January 24 in the north-central town of Anuradhapura. In his discussions with Akashi, Suda said, the PM mentioned mistakes the GSL had made regarding development. The PM related, for example, that the GSL had failed to draft a comprehensive plan to develop the north/east, and had not developed a mechanism to provide aid to that region in the near- term, such as a joint GSL-LTTE committee. Wickremesinghe commented that the GSL was drafting a 10- year infrastructure plan for the northern town of Kilinochchi, which the government would provide to the Tigers soon. Wickremesinghe also touched on the ceasefire agreement, noting that specific articles of that document focused on normalization, which the GSL was now struggling to implement due to the uncertainty over who was in charge of the peace process. 7. (C) On the cohabitation impasse, Akashi stressed the need for the PM to be flexible. Wickremesinghe responded that he had been studying various ideas on how to share control of the Defense Ministry. The PM noted, for example, that he might be willing to discuss the setting up of a national security council with the President. Suda reported that during Akashi's second meeting with the PM, Akashi provided Wickremesinghe with an account of his meeting with President Kumaratunga. Akashi again stressed that the Prime Minister should show a willingness to compromise with respect to resolving the cohabitation crisis, and give the President some way to save face. Wickremesinghe said he was considering compromising but that the extent of any such effort would depend on the President's actions. ------- COMMENT ------- 8. (C) Toward the close of the briefing, Ambassador Lunstead asked whether Akashi had left Sri Lanka with any sense of optimism that the cohabitation impasse would be resolved soon. While the situation was very complex, Suda related that Akashi saw some positive threads. Akashi, for example, felt the PM was taking the situation seriously and seemed willing to work to resolve the crisis. President Kumaratunga, in the meantime, had listened to Akashi carefully, and was more relaxed than in past meetings. Overall, Suda said he thought the visit was a net positive. We agree with that assessment. The visit was timely, especially in reminding the protagonists in the cohabitation impasse that the international community is watching impatiently, wanting them to overcome their differences. In its focus on helping resolve the cohabitation dispute, engaging the LTTE, and working with donors on ways to get more aid flowing, we also think Akashi's visit helped set the stage for the Washington co-chairs meeting scheduled for February 17. END COMMENT. 9. (U) Minimize considered. LUNSTEAD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04