Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ANKARA7318 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ANKARA7318 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2003-11-25 09:23:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | EFIN EIND ECON PGOV TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 007318 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE FOR E, EB/IFD, AND EUR/SE TREASURY FOR OASIA - JLEICHTER AND MMILLS NSC FOR MBRYZA AND TMCKIBBEN E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EFIN, EIND, ECON, PGOV, TU SUBJECT: MEETING WITH PRIVATIZATION AUTHORITY OFFICIAL REF: ANKARA 7052 1. (SBU) Summary: Privatization Authority (PA) Vice President Ayhan Sarisu told emboffs that the PA intended to retender Tekel,s tobacco operations sometime early next year, and dismissed as baseless a lawsuit brought by a union to block the sale of Tekel,s alcohol operations. End Summary. ----- TEKEL ----- 2. (SBU) Econoff and Econ Specialist met November 21 with Ayhan Sarisu, who is responsible for the Tekel privatization process. Sarisu denied recent local press reports that the GOT had decided to adopt a new strategy for Tekel,s tobacco operations, under which each cigarette brand will be sold separately. Sarisu said that such an approach was unworkable, in that it would take more than two years. Sarisu also rejected press reports that the PA would set a minimum price, stating that this would be illegal and in any event unnecessary, since &everyone knows what the minimum is.8 Sarisu further admitted that he could not predict whether new bids would be any higher than those already rejected. 3. (SBU) Sarisu described as &partially correct8 a recent Financial Times article which claimed that lack of financial information on Tekel was one of the critical factors in the low bids. Sarisu claimed that bidders received all historical information requested. However, some bidders were unhappy with Tekel,s financial statements, since they were audited in accordance with Turkish rules, and not international standards, and requested new financial statements to be prepared in accordance with international standards. The PA was unable to provide such statements, according to Sarisu,because it would have taken six months just to tender for the auditors. 4. (SBU) Separately, a union representing Tekel workers recently filed suit, and obtained a court stay, against the sale of Tekel,s alcohol operations (reftel). Sarisu described the suit as &absolute garbage8 and a form of blackmail. He said that the stay would be appealed immediately, and is confident it will be overturned. ------------- PETKIM/TUPRAS ------------- 5. (SBU) According to Sarisu, the Tupras sale is expected to conclude by year end. Accordingly, the Petkim bidding deadline has been extended from 18 November 2003 to 30 January 2004, so that Petkim bidders can know the identity of Tupras, purchaser (see reftel). ------------ TURK TELEKOM ------------ 6. (SBU) Though he is not responsible for the Turk Telekom privatization, Sarisu does not believe that the &golden share8 to be retained by the State will materially adversely affect the sale price. Sarisu noted that the GOT did not intend to utilize its position to influence operations, but merely to have access to management information. Sarisu further noted that in other (unidentified) sales the PA was willing to cancel the golden share, and could do so for Turk Telekom, without parliamentary approval. Sarisu assured Econoff that the PA would work with bidders to allay any concerns they might have about the golden share. ------------ HIDAYET KAYA ------------ 7. (SBU) Kaya, the only remaining PA Vice President appointed by the former government, was fired November 19. Sarisu said there was no hint of scandal surrounding Kaya,s activities. Rather, Kaya had been criticized by the Prime Minister,s Inspection Board for &procedural problems8 in connection with his supervision of the Tofas and Tekel privatizations. (Sarisu had subsequently been given responsibility for Tekel.) Sarisu stated that Kaya,s replacement should be named &very soon.8 Comment: The removal of Kaya, right after the political embarrassment of the failed Tekel tobacco tender, provides another example of the GOT,s responding to adverse events by replacing officials held over from the Ecevit Government. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04