Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03AMMAN7339 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03AMMAN7339 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Amman |
| Created: | 2003-11-10 12:15:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KMDR JO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 AMMAN 007339 SIPDIS STATE FOR NEA/ARN, NEA/PA, NEA/AIA, INR/NESA, R/MR, I/GNEA, B/BXN, B/BRN, NEA/PPD, NEA/IPA FOR ALTERMAN USAID/ANE/MEA LONDON FOR GOLDRICH PARIS FOR O'FRIEL E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KMDR JO SUBJECT: AMMAN, MEDIA REACTION ON REACTIONS TO THE PRESIDENT'S SPEECH, RIYADH BOMBINGS SUMMARY TWO MAIN THEMES DOMINATED THE JORDANIAN MEDIA BETWEEN FRIDAY 7 AND MONDAY 10: THE PRESIDENT'S SPEECH CALLING FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS, AND THE RIYADH BOMBINGS. REACTIONS TO THE PRESIDENT'S SPEECH REFLECTED THE FOLLOWING POINTS: MISTRUST IN THE PRESIDENT'S SINCERITY IN WANTING DEMOCRACY IN ARAB COUNTRIES DISMISSIVENESS OF HIS PRAISE FOR JORDAN, AND WARNINGS TO THE JORDANIAN LEADERSHIP TO REMEMBER THE FATE OF OTHER CAPITALS IN THE REGION THAT BANKED ON THEIR STRATEGIC ALLIANCE WITH WASHINGTON. CRITICISM FOR FAILING TO "MAKE A SINGLE REFERENCE TO SHARON'S CRIMES IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES." REGARDING THE BOMBINGS IN SAUDI ARABIA, COMMENTATORS WERE ROUNDLY CRITICAL OF THE ATTACK ON CIVILIANS, TO THE POINT WHERE THEY COMPARED THE PERPETRATORS TO ARIEL SHARON. BELOW ARE SAMPLE COMMENTARIES: -- ATTACKING RIYADH USING SHARON'S METHODS INFLUENTIAL DAILY COLUMNIST MAHMOUD AL-RIMAWI WROTE IN SEMI-OFFICIAL INFLUENTIAL ARABIC DAILY AL-RAI ON NOVEMBER 10: "IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN RIGHTLY SAID THAT EXTREMISTS ARE ALLIES, EVEN IF THEIR AIMS ARE DIFFERENT. THE HORRIFYING EVENTS IN RIYADH COME AS AN ECHO TO THE SUPPORTS THAT THE NEO-CONSERVATIVES IN WASHINGTON GIVE TO ISRAELI BARBARISM. IN BOTH CASES CIVILIANS ARE ATTACKED, IN THE NAME OF RELIGION AND IN THE NAME OF SPREADING DEMOCRACY. EITHER WAY THE ACTS ARE GUIDED BY BLIND FANATICISM AND LACK OF RESPECT FOR HUMAN LIFE, EVEN THOUGH SHARON IS MORE BLATANT IN IMPLEMENTING HIS POLICY OF ETHNIC CLEANSING WITH TOTAL AMERICAN SUPPORT, WHICH THE U.S. GIVES WITHOUT SHAME." -- BUSH THE PREACHER TAHER AL-ADWAN, CHIEF EDITOR OF INDEPENDENT, MASS- APPEAL ARABIC DAILY AL-ARAB AL-YAWM WROTE ON SATURDAY 8: "BUSH'S PRAISE OF DEMOCRACY IN JORDAN MEANS NOTHING, BECAUSE IT ONLY PUTS US IN THE COMPANY OF A NUMBER OF STATES WHOM HE PRAISED, EVEN THOUGH DEMOCRATIC REFORMS IN THEM HAVE YET TO START. THIS PRAISE CANNOT COVER THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS HAPPENING IN IRAQ, SUCH AS THE DESTRUCTION THE ARRESTS, AND THE TERRORIZATION OF FAMILIES IN THEIR BEDROOMS. DEMOCRACY BASED ON THE MODEL OF THE U.S. IN IRAQ OR ZIONISM IN PALESTINE IS NOTHING BUT CORRUPT GOODS THAT WILL NOT FIND ANY TAKERS. IN FACT IT IS AN INSULT TO EVERY ARAB." -- BUSH'S SPEECH ON DEMOCRACY PROMINENT DAILY COMMENTATOR FAHED AL-FANEK WROTE IN SEMI-OFFICIAL INFLUENTIAL ARABIC DAILY AL-RAI ON NOVEMBER 9: "BUSH'S SPEECH OUTLINES A POLITICAL PROGRAM, AND THE FACT THAT HE PUTS SYRIA IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS PRE-WAR IRAQ IS NOT COMFORTING. BUT THE QUESTION IS, DOES THE U.S. MEAN WHAT IT SAYS, OR IS THIS A MEANS OF APPLYING -PRESSURE ON ARAB RULERS TO COLLABORATE FURTHER WITH THE OCCUPATION AGAINST THE WISHES OF THEIR PEOPLES? THE U.S. KNOWS WELL THAT THESE COUNTRIES WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SUPPORT IT IN ITS OCCUPATION OF IRAQ HAD THEY BEEN DEMOCRATIC." -- JORDAN IN THE REVISIONIST SPEECH LEADING COMMENTATOR URAIB AL-RANTAWI WROTE IN CENTER- LEFT, INFLUENTIAL ARABIC DAILY AL-DUSTOUR ON NOVEMBER 9: "I CANNOT IMAGINE WHY BUSH REFERRED TO JORDAN'S RECENT PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS AS HISTORIC. IF THEY PRODUCED RESULTS THAT THE U.S. SEES AS HISTORIC, HOW COME WE DO NOT SEE THAT? . NO ONE SHOULD BE COMFORTED BY BUSH'S PRAISE, PARTLY BECAUSE WE STILL NEED POLITICAL REFORMS. FOR INSTANCE, THE U.S. SHOULD RESPECT US MORE IF WE WERE TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO DEMONSTRATE DENOUNCING U.S. POLICY IN THE MIDDLE EAST THAN IF WE WERE TO REPRESS THE PEOPLE AND PREVENT THEIR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION. MOREOVER, THIS TRANSITIONAL SATISFACTION WITH JORDAN WILL NEVER BE PERMANENT, AND WE CAN LEARN THE LESSON FROM THE `STRATEGIC ALLIANCES' THAT MANY CAPITALS IN THE REGION HAD WITH WASHINGTON, AND WHAT HAS BECOME OF THESE ALLIANCES." -- CREDIBILITY THAT IS COLLAPSING ON HOT SAND LIBERAL DAILY COLUMNIST JAMIL AL-NIMRI WROTE IN INDEPENDENT, MASS-APPEAL ARABIC DAILY AL-ARAB AL-YAWM ON SUNDAY 9: "WHAT CREDIBILITY DOES BUSH HAVE WHEN HE PURSUES AN INSANE POLICY THAT SURPRISES ALL OBSERVERS, AND THAT HAS PUT THE U.S. IN AN UNPRECEDENTED POSITION, WHERE ALL PEOPLE OF THE WORLD VIEW ITS POLICY WITH DISAPPROVAL, EVEN DISDAIN. WHAT CREDIBILITY DOES BUSH HAVE WHEN HE SAYS NOT A WORD ABOUT SHARON'S CRIMES IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES?" GNEHM
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04