Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ROME4684 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ROME4684 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2003-10-14 16:17:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL MOPS ET IT AVIATION |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 004684 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/13/2013 TAGS: PREL, MOPS, ET, IT, AVIATION SUBJECT: ITALIAN REQUEST FOR USAF ASSISTANCE TO TRANSPORT AXUM OBELISK REF: ROME 03576 Classified By: POL M/C T. Countryman; Reasons 1.5 (b) and (d). 1. (C) Summary and Action Request: EmbOffs met with MFA Africa Director General Cabras to follow-up on the GOI's request for the use of USAF C-5 aircraft to fly three large pieces of the Axum obelisk from either Rome or Naples to Axum (reftel). POL M/C described the procedural steps required and presented an estimate of costs to be covered by the GOI. Cabras thanked the USG for its response, confirmed the GOI's commitment to returning the obelisk, discussed other transportation options and requested a follow-up technical meeting to go over details. Request Department's advice on status of GOI request for assistance, particularly whether or not Department intends to inform DOD/OSP that it is in U.S. national interest. End Summary and Action Request. BACKGROUND 2. (C) POL M/C, DAO representative and PolOff met with MFA Director General for Sub-Saharan Africa, Bruno Cabras, to discuss the GOI's request for US Air Force assistance in transporting the Axum Obelisk back to Ethiopia. In 1937, the Axum Obelisk was cut into three pieces by Mussolini's forces, brought to Rome and erected in front of the Ministry of Italian Africa (now the Food and Agriculture Organization). The obelisk still stands today somewhat worse for wear from pollution and a recent lightning strike. In 1997 the GOI formally committed to returning the obelisk and is now actively planning its final return. The GOI plans to divide the obelisk into three large parts that can then be airlifted to Axum. The dismantlement operation began October 10, according to the press. Due to the large size and weight of the pieces, the GOI is requesting USG assistance. PROCEDURES AND COSTS 3. (C) During the meeting POL M/C explained that in order for USG aircraft to be used, the Department of State had to certify that the project was of national interest to the USG. Once a formal request is made by State to DOD/OSP, the final procedural steps lie with DOD officials. Furthermore, if the project is accepted, the timing, final costs and technical aspects come under DOD authority. 4. (C) POL M/C presented the DOD's estimated figure of USD 3.5 million based on the size and weight specifications provided by the GOI. This figure is based on the need for four C-5 missions from Naples to Axum and includes Axum airport feasibility studies. POL M/C emphasized that this was an unofficial minimum estimate of costs. 5. (C) Cabras understood the procedural steps required and did not balk at the estimated cost. He did however, explain that he was expecting three rather than four missions. He was certain that the GOI Office of Antiquities would not permit the obelisk to be divided into four parts. 6. (C) DAO Representative expressed the requirement to divide the obelisk into four rather than three pieces due to the estimated weight (86 tons) of the largest piece. Cabras stated that the GOI needed to make a more precise estimate of the weight of the three pieces. The partition of the obelisk is one of the technical issues that must be clarified in order to finalize transportation and cost details. OTHER OPTIONS AND CHALLENGES 7. (C) In addition to focusing on three rather than four missions, Cabras also explored the possibility of using a mix of AN-124s and C-5s. He felt that by using the C-5 for only the largest pieces and the AN-124 for other pieces, the GOI might be able to accomplish the mission at a lower cost. 8. (C) POL M/C and DAO representative inquired about other options - specifically sea-land routes - entering through the ports of Massawa or Djibouti. Cabras stated that these options were not feasible due to political and infrastructure obstacles. Regarding Massawa, the Ethiopian and Eritrean governments remain at odds over their border deliberations and it would be politically risky to give Asmara the chance to interfere with the shipment. In addition, the road from Massawa to Axum is in bad condition. Although there are no political obstacles with Djibouti, the same holds for the trajectory from Djibouti to Axum. Cabras reiterated that the only option that GOI experts had yet identified as feasible would be an airlift directly to Axum. REQUESTS AND COMMITMENTS 9. (C) Cabras requested a follow-up meeting between DOD representatives and GOI engineers in October in order to clarify and define the project and expressed his hope that the USG would accept the project. POL M/C and DAO representative committed to presenting a formal request to the Department and to holding a follow-up meeting in the coming weeks. SEMBLER NNNN 2003ROME04684 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04