Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03COLOMBO1779 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03COLOMBO1779 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Colombo |
| Created: | 2003-10-14 04:34:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ETRD ECON CE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 140434Z Oct 03
UNCLAS COLOMBO 001779 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, ECON, CE SUBJECT: INDIAN HIGH COMMISSION TAKE ON INDO-LANKA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT EXPANSION REF: COLOMBO 1704 1. (U) THIS TELEGRAM IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, PLEASE HANDLE ACCORDINGLY 2. (SBU) On October 7, 2003, Econchief met with Mr. Venkastesan Ashok, Commercial Counselor at the Indian High Commission. Ashok discussed preparations for the Sri Lankan PM's trip to New Delhi the week of October 20. In bilateral meetings just completed in Kandy, Sri Lanka's second largest city, the GOI and the GSL reportedly agreed on a framework for pursuing an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA). This agreement would broaden the Indo-Lanka Free Trade Agreement beyond trade in goods to include trade in services, investment promotion and increased economic cooperation. 3. (SBU) Ashok thought that the joint commission that had been appointed to prepare the framework for EPA negotiations would finalize its report in time for PM Wickremesinghe and PM Vajpayee to approve it in their joint statement during Wickremesinghe's October visit to India. This approval would then launch formal negotiations, which Ashok thought would last 4-6 months. Ashok said India had recently begun wrapping up negotiations on a similar agreement with Singapore. The negotiations on that front took almost 11 months. The Singapore negotiations, however, provide a framework agreement that the GOI and GSL can use in their discussions. 4. (SBU) Comment: We find this information interesting in light of TIFA planning and the potential for a US-Sri Lanka FTA. Much as the GSL has done with its analysis of the Singapore and Chile FTAs, they seem to be pursuing a similar strategy with the GOI, piggy-backing on the GOI-Singapore EPA as a model. Further, Ashok never mentioned the rancor in Cancun and gave no indication that Sri Lanka's siding with the USG in Mexico would have any bearing on the progress of a potential GOI-SL EPA. As we reported reftel, the GSL's Commerce Minister discussed the GSL's WTO position with the GOI in Cancun and felt the GOI understood its position. The Commerce Ministry's Acting Director General told Econchief on October 8 that India seems unconcerned about the GSL's stance in Cancun and that the G-23 already appears fragile. End Comment. LUNSTEAD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04