Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ANKARA6332 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ANKARA6332 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2003-10-08 13:53:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR TU Press Summaries |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 006332 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EUR/SE, EUR/PD, NEA/PD, DRL JCS PASS J-5/CDR S. WRIGHT E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, TU, Press Summaries SUBJECT: ANKARA MEDIA REACTION REPORT WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2003 THIS REPORT WILL PRESENT A TURKISH PRESS SUMMARY UNDER THREE THEMES: HEADLINES BRIEFING EDITORIAL OPINION HEADLINES MASS APPEAL Powell congratulates Gul on troop approval - Sabah Turks going to Iraq for peace - Hurriyet AP: First Muslim troops to Iraq - Hurriyet Iraqi governing council against Turkish troops - Turkiye KDP rep Dizayee threatens Turkey - Turkiye California's choice: Schwarzenegger - Milliyet OPINION MAKERS U.S. gets what it wants: Turkey joins Iraq's occupation - Cumhuriyet Motion passes, Turkish soldiers to Iraq - Zaman Both U.S., EU happy with troops decision - Zaman AKP government takes a deep breath - Radikal Erdogan: We are not going to war - Yeni Safak Erdogan: We are not an occupation force - Radikal KDP's Dizayee: Turks can't pass through N. Iraq - Cumhuriyet Israel increases tension, threatens Syria again - Zaman Chalabi to do business in Iraq with Perle's man - Yeni Safak Bashar Asad: Israel provokes war - Milliyet FBI gave Hamas money in 1998, 1999 - Cumhuriyet BRIEFING Parliament approves Turkish peacekeepers to Iraq: Turkey's parliament voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday -- 358 to 183 -- to send troops to Iraq. The parliament authorized the government to deploy troops to join the international stabilization mission in Iraq for one year. The size of the Turkish troop contingent and the route for their passage into Iraq will be determined in talks with the Americans. Dailies regard the voting as an AK Party initiative to gain influence in the region, and as an effort to repair strained relations with the U.S. Ankara is obliged to respond positively to Washington's request for cooperation in Iraq to avoid larger security risks in the future, "Zaman" emphasized. The struggle against the PKK/KADEK will be tougher without support from the U.S., the paper notes. A prospective Kurdish state in Northern Iraq might become a threat for Turkey's unitary state structure, "Zaman" added. "Cumhuriyet" denounced the approval of the motion, and claimed that Turkey is providing support for the occupation of Iraq. Parliament's approval of the motion is in line with the conditions on the $8.5 billion U.S. loan for Turkey, "Cumhuriyet" reports. Iraqi interim government reaction: While Turkish lawmakers were debating the motion in a closed parliamentary session, Iraqi Governing Council representatives said they had agreed unanimously to reject peacekeepers from neighboring countries, including Turkey. It soon became clear that this was a Kurdish move designed to influence the decision of the Turkish parliament, papers report. Dailies believe that Washington intervened to halt the release of the Iraqi interim council declaration. KDP Turkey representative Safeen Dizayee voiced opposition to a Turkish military presence in Iraq, and warned that Turks would not be allowed to use Northern Iraq for transit passage. Dizayee added that a recent attack on Turkish truck drivers around Baghdad should be seen as a message to Ankara. Washington's reaction: Secretary Powell phoned Foreign Minister Gul and thanked Ankara for the troop decision. White House Spokesman Scott McCallen said that the U.S. and Turkey would work out details, including the size and location of Turkish troops. "Hurriyet" reports that a member of the U.S. Senate foreign affairs committee said Turkey was acting in the way a friend and ally would be expected to act. U.S., Turkey to discuss technical details for deployment: Turkey and the U.S. will soon sign an MOU on the technical details of the Turkish peacekeeping mission in Iraq, "Milliyet" reports. Ankara is inclined to send 5,000-6,000 troops initially, and will set up a logistical coordination center in Silopi. "Aksam" expects an American delegation in Ankara early next week for detailed discussions. "Zaman" believes that Ankara would be reluctant to send soldiers during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Foreign Minister Gul told AK Party lawmakers before the voting that his government is planning to deploy about 10,000 Turkish soldiers in the Dohuk-Mosul-Tikrit triangle. EDITORIAL OPINION: Iraq/Turkish parliament's decision "Turkey begins its Iraq adventure" Murat Yetkin wrote in the liberal-intellectual Radikal (10/8): "Turkey has launched its adventure in Iraq following the parliament's authorization. Now the talk is about the upcoming meetings with the US regarding Turkey's mission. Turkey is likely to control the area north of Baghdad with a brigade. If other Muslim countries such as Pakistan contribute to the Turkish brigade, it would go a long way toward eliminating the current "Crusader" image of the occupying force. It is also obvious that Kurdish groups are reacting negatively because they fear losing their gains with the presence of Turkish forces. Such objections will not have an effect in the long run, but let us hope that the Kurdish groups will not shed blood in the short run." "This is the nation's will" Editor-in-Chief of mass appeal daily Hurriyet, Ertugrul Ozkok noted (10/8): "Turkey has made an historically important decision, and Turkey has done the right thing. . The same Turkish parliament's previous decision was a negative one. Today the parliament voted for the deployment of troops. The former was interpreted as a `victory of democracy,' but the latter should be viewed in the same context. .With this decision, Turkey will take its place in the western world and distance itself from post-cold-war turbulence. Turkish forces will not serve in Iraq for the sake of the 8.5 billion dollars. Turkish forces will protect Turkey's regional interests and ensure regional peace by serving in Iraq." "Fairytale" Fehmi Koru argued in the Islamic-intellectual Yeni Safak (10/8): "Both Washington and London have failed dramatically in their estimations and calculations for Iraq. The Iraqis were happy to get rid of Saddam, but they did not welcome the occupation forces. The Iraqi people's reaction turned into resistance in a short period of time. This is the main reason for the US asking Turkey to join the effort. . Are we ready for the consequences if the calculations based on which the Turkish parliament based its decision are proven false? Are we prepared for the consequences if the internal balances are turned upside down? If we face a similar failure as the US and UK, who is going to pay the bill?" EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04