Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03THEHAGUE2530 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03THEHAGUE2530 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy The Hague |
| Created: | 2003-10-03 08:13:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ETTC PTER EFIN IZ NL EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 THE HAGUE 002530 SIPDIS STATE FOR EB/ESC/TFS, S/CT, EUR/ERA, EUR/PGI, INR/EC, IO/PHO TREASURY FOR ZARATE JUSTICE FOR OIA/FRIEDMAN FBI FOR LORMEL BRUSSELS ALSO FOR LEGATT E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/30/2008 TAGS: ETTC, PTER, EFIN, IZ, NL, EUN SUBJECT: TERRORIST FINANCE: CONSULTATIONS OF EB/TFC DEPUTY DIRECTOR GOFF IN THE NETHERLANDS Classified By: DCM Daniel R. Russel Reason 1.5(b) and (d) 1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Ed Goff, Deputy Director EB/ESC/TFC, met Sept 11-12 with Dutch officials, bankers, and U.S. Embassy staff to share ideas in the war on terrorist financing. These officials reiterated Dutch commitment to furthering terrorist financing efforts both domestically and in the EU. They said the Dutch are willing to advance the terrorist financing agenda during their upcoming EU presidency with Finance Ministry officials particularly stressing the need for progress in enacting a new EU anti-moneylaundering directive. Goff and Embassy officials discussed the utility of an early small informal conference of terrorist finance action officers from selected US Embassies in Europe to set the stage for progress during the Irish, Dutch, and UK EU presidencies. End summary. Meetings with Embassy Officers --------------------------------------------- ------- 2. (SBU) Emboffs related to Mr. Goff their excellent ongoing cooperation w/ Dutch counterterrorism authorities, especially on terrorism finance and transportation security issues. They noted the upcoming EU presidencies of Ireland and the Netherlands and observed that the two had agreed to cooperate with each other in order to provide more continuity in the Presidency. It was suggested that since the Department has a number of objectives for the EU in the counterterrorism finance arena, it might be appropriate for officers responsible for the working level management of such issues to meet in an informal setting before the New Year in order to orient newly participating Emboffs, to brief Department priorities, and to explore other possibilities for action. It would be appropriate, in this context, to include terrorist finance action officers from the Hague, Dublin, USEU, Rome (the current EU President), and London, additional European posts that may have issues of concern as well as working-level representatives of Washington agencies. Representatives from Embassies Berlin, Paris and Spain might be included for their insight into EU controversies. In any case it was thought that it would be appropriate to keep the meeting small and informal enough to enable free and frank discussions. Finance Ministry -------------------------- 3. (SBU) Accompanied by Econoff Todd Kushner, on Friday, Goff met with officials from the Integrity Division of the Ministry of Finance: Margreet H.M. Wenting (action officer on designation issues), Klaas Werkhorst (Division Director) and Dr. EYC Lightart, (Deputy Division Director). These officials highlighted their roles in ensuring Dutch financial institutions receive designations promptly and in an easily usable format. This process, they said, has been greatly systemized since the days immediately after 9/11/01 and now is largely conducted electronically. Werkhorst revealed that the GONL is preparing legislation that would require financial institutions upon the request of the Finance Ministry to search their records for transactions of individuals and entities who are not designated but are of interest. Wenting noted the need for clear identifiers of individuals who are designated, so that financial institutions can review their records with greater precision. Mr. Goff observed that practice had evolved since the initial designations, and that now the USG undertakes extensive efforts to ensure that detailed identification information is provided, when available. Wenting explained Dutch procedures for handling situations where a financial institution uncovers accounts held by a person or entity that matches or partly matches a designation but cannot conclude that the account and the designee are the same; in those situations, the name and account information are turned over to the Dutch security service (AIVD) which has two weeks to determine if the account holder and the designee match. If the AIVD does not come back with an affirmative decision, the accounts are unfrozen. 4. (SBU) Finance officials also noted that terrorist finance was high on the list of items the Dutch Finance Ministry wants to tackle during the 2004 (latter half) Dutch EU presidency. In particular, the Dutch would like to promote enactment of a third EU money laundering directive that would incorporate the latest FATF thinking. They were very open and interested in exploring how U.S.-EU cooperation against terrorist financing could be intensified in the period leading up to and through the Dutch EU presidency. 5. (SBU) Reflecting an internal discussion of whether the Dutch government should resume welfare payments to Jose Maria Sison, who (although designated by the U.S. and EU is still resident in the Netherlands), Dr. Ligthart asked about U.S. practice on payments to individuals who have had their assets frozen. Mr. Goff explained that it has been standard practice to permit individuals whose assets have been frozen limited access to resources, a practice needed on humanitarian grounds and carried out in accordance with UNSC Resolution 1452. Finance officials were also interested in USG delisting procedures. They observed that eventually courts in one country or another will rule negatively on a listing thereby forcing a country out of compliance with UNSC Res 1373 or 1390. Mr. Werkhorst wondered what thought had been given to this by the USG. Mr. Goff observed that comprehensive USG reviews of cases ensure judicial reversals are unlikely, but acknowledged that it was not outside the realm of possibility that such a case could arise. Foreign Ministry -------------------------- 6. (C) In a separate meeting hosted by Jaap Werner (Foreign Ministry Political Affairs Director) that also included representatives from MFA's European Affairs and Middle East Departments, MFA officials indicated their ongoing attention to driving the Dutch interagency process in the direction of more and higher quality designations (i.e., not just designating terrorist organizations but their supporters, fundraisers, and front organizations) and effective law enforcement actions against terrorist support networks in the Netherlands. They noted that within the Dutch interagency process and within the EU clearinghouse the ability to draw on convincing information regarding the terrorist connections of entities considered for designation is key to making that happen. Werner mentioned the recent EU clearinghouse discussions regarding possible designation on the six Hamas leaders and 4 charity organizations noting that France had maintained a hold on the leaders for political reasons and that Austria, France, and the UK had reservations on the four Hamas-linked charities on informational grounds. The Italian presidency would request more information on the four organizations, Werner noted, "but perhaps these countries could find and table more information on the charities if they wanted to." 7. (C) Werner continued that EU member states needed to ensure they had enough information linking terrorist organizations to individuals or entities considered for designation to forestall any potentially successful court challenges. He asked whether the Palestinian Authority, now that it had taken action against the Hamas financial based, could provide more detailed information on Hamas fundraising links to European non-profits. Foreign Ministry officials also raised the following other sanctions issues: Helms-Burton & ILSA - Mr Goff noted that these are outside of his office's direct responsibility, but assured the Dutch that our policies continue in place. Werner said that with Castro's recent crackdowns on dissent, the EU was reviewing its common position toward Cuba on an almost daily basis Libya: Goff reiterated that per high level statements, U.S. sanctions remain in place; Iraq- The Dutch urged the U.S. to work with the UN to designate additional individuals under UNSC Res 1483 in order to provide clear guidance to financial institutions regarding the accounts they were supposed to take action toward. They noted the existence of Iraq-related accounts frozen in the Netherlands stemming from UN resolutions following the First Gulf War. However, the Netherlands would not be able to turn these funds over to the Iraq Development Fund until new legislation allowing for confiscation of these assets is approved and enacted domestically. Dutch Bankers Association ------------------------------------------- 8. Goff and Kushner also met with Netherlands Bankers Association Secretary for Security Affairs Ruud K. Oord and ABN AMRO Director of Group Compliance M.A. Dorgelo. These officials reaffirmed the continuing commitment of Dutch financial institutions to deny terrorists use of the financial system but noted it has been difficult for banks to absorb and implement the many new regulations and procedures imposed by government authorities in their efforts against terrorist financing. Dorgelo observed that there has been very little feedback from security agencies on SARs reporting and other efforts by banks to identify suspect transactions and individuals. He emphasized that without feedback the edge would go out of the program. Mr. Oord also observed that unlike in the U.S., banks in the Netherlands are liable if they freeze in error, even if it is pursuant to official direction. This stands, he stated, in direct contrast to U.S. practice where the liability is absorbed by OFAC. SOBEL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04