Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ROME4443 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ROME4443 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2003-09-29 06:59:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | AORC EAGR PHUM EAID FAO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ROME 004443 SIPDIS STATE FOR L/HRR, IO/EDA, EB/TPP/ATP USAID FOR CUMMINGS USDA/FAS FOR REICH AND HUGHES SENSITIVE FROM FODAG E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: AORC, EAGR, PHUM, EAID, FAO SUBJECT: RIGHT TO FOOD: BUREAU MEETING TO PREPARE INFORMAL TEXT OF VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES, 15-19 SEP 2003 REFS: (A) ROME 3404, (B) ROME 1380, (C) ROME 1890, (D) ROME 4177 CONTAINS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED SECTIONS THAT ARE INTENDED STRICTLY FOR INTERNAL USG USE. 1. (U) SUMMARY: ON SEPTEMBER 15-19, THE UNITED STATES PARTICIPATED AS THE NORTH AMERICAN MEMBER OF THE BUREAU OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKING GROUP (IGWG) FOR THE ELABORATION OF VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES TO SUPPORT THE PROGRESSIVE REALIZATION OF THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD IN THE CONTEXT OF NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY. AT THIS SESSION, THE BUREAU COMPLETED ITS WORK ON THE OPENING TEXT FOR THE VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES. DESPITE THE U.S. OFTEN BEING THE ONLY BUREAU MEMBER ADVOCATING IMPORTANT CHANGES IN THE WORKING INFORMAL TEXT, THE DISCUSSIONS LED TO THE DRAMATIC IMPROVEMENT OF THAT TEXT. END SUMMARY. ---------- BACKGROUND ---------- 2. (U) OPERATIVE PARAGRAPH 10 OF THE 2002 DECLARATION OF THE WORLD FOOD SUMMIT FIVE YEARS LATER INVITED THE FAO TO ESTABLISH AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKING GROUP "TO ELABORATE, IN A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS, A SET OF VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES TO SUPPORT MEMBER STATES' EFFORTS TO ACHIEVE THE PROGRESSIVE REALIZATION OF THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD IN THE CONTEXT OF NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY...." 3. (U) IN THE MONTHS FOLLOWING LAST MARCH'S INTRODUCTORY MEETING OF THE IWG, THE BUREAU, WITH SUPPORT FROM THE FAO SECRETARIAT, HAS BEEN WORKING ON THE OPENING DRAFT GUIDELINES. DEALING WITH AN INITIAL FAO SECRETARIAT DRAFT THAT WAS DEEPLY PROBLEMATIC, BUREAU SIPDIS MEETINGS IN JULY (REF A) RECOMMENDED SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT TEXT. AFTER THAT SESSION, THE SECRETARIAT PREPARED A SECOND DRAFT, WHICH THE SIPDIS DEPARTMENT, IN CONSULTATION WITH CONCERNED AGENCIES, REVIEWED PRIOR TO THE BUREAU MEETING. ----------------------- BUREAU AND PARTICIPANTS ----------------------- 4. (U) AMBASSADOR SAEID NOORI-NAEINI (IRAN) CHAIRED THE MEETINGS. AMBASSADOR CHRISTIAN MONNOYER (BELGIUM), AMBASSADOR GURGEL DE ALENCAR (BRAZIL), MR. HAMADOUN CISSE (MALI), MR. NOEL D. DE LUNA (PHILIPPINES), MS. TIFFANY BABINGTON (NEW ZEALAND) (REPLACING PETER BENNET), AND L/HRR ASSISTANT LEGAL ADVISER ROBERT HARRIS (REPLACING LUCY TAMLYN) PARTICIPATED IN THE DISCUSSIONS. US MISSION OFFICER WILLEM BRAKEL PARTICIPATED IN THE SESSIONS AS AN OBSERVER. ------------------------ WORK ON THE OPENING TEXT ------------------------ 5. (U) PRIOR TO THE SESSION, THE DEPARTMENT IDENTIFIED A NUMBER OF PROBLEMS WITH THE SECRETARIAT'S SECOND DRAFT TEXT, AND CAME WITH DETAILED AND EXTENSIVE PROPOSALS, INTER ALIA: (1) TO DELETE OR CORRECT PROBLEMATIC LANGUAGE THAT WOULD MISCHARACTERIZE THE NATURE OF A FOOD-RELATED RIGHTS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW OR IMPLY U.S. ACCEPTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS THAT IT DOES NOT ACCEPT; (2) RESIST LANGUAGE, IN THE INTERNATIONAL ARENA, INCONSISTENT WITH U.S. POLICY IN THE AREA OF THE PROVISION OF INTERNATIONAL FOOD AID, EMBARGOES, AND OTHER ECONOMIC POLICIES; (3) ADD LANGUAGE TO BETTER REFLECT INTERNATIONALLY-AGREED UPON FOOD SECURITY APPROACHES AND THE SORTS OF DOMESTIC MEASURES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND FOOD SECURITY SET OUT, INTER ALIA, IN THE MONTERREY CONSENSUS; AND (4) OTHERWISE KEEP THE NEGOTIATIONS FOCUSED ON THE LIMITATIONS OF ITS MANDATE BY, INTER ALIA, DELETING LANGUAGE THAT WAS NOT VOLUNTARY, WOULD PURPORT TO APPLY TO INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT, OR WHICH ATTEMPTED TO INSTRUCT INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS (INCLUDING THE WORLD BANK) ON HOW THEY SHOULD CONDUCT THEIR OPERATIONS. 6. (SBU) BUREAU SESSIONS WERE CORDIAL AND PRODUCTIVE. GIVEN THE EXTENSIVE CHANGES THE U.S. REPRESENTED NEEDED TO MAKE TO THE DRAFT, THE DISCUSSIONS TOOK ON THE FLAVOR ROME 00004443 002 OF 003 AS BALANCED AND FAIR IN HIS HANDLING OF ISSUES. AS A GENERAL MATTER, THE TASK OF THE U.S. BUREAU MEMBER WAS MADE MORE DIFFICULT BECAUSE OTHER POTENTIALLY LIKE-MINDED BUREAU MEMBERS DID NOT SPEAK UP. THE BELGIAN REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT FEEL HE HAD CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS FROM EU GOVERNMENTS AND DID NOT SPEAK ON MANY ISSUES. THE NEW ZEALAND REPRESENTATIVE WAS NEW TO THE ISSUE, DID NOT HAVE INSTRUCTIONS FROM WELLINGTON, AND HAD TO MISS ABOUT HALF OF THE SESSIONS DUE TO OTHER COMMITMENTS. ON MOST RIGHTS-RELATED ISSUES, APART FROM OCCASIONAL SYMPATHETIC UTTERANCES FROM NEW ZEALAND, THE UNITED STATES WAS ALONE IN ADVANCING ITS POSITION. AS REPORTED IN REF C, THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE LEGAL OFFICE IN THE FAO SECRETARIAT PARTICIPATED SUBSTANTIVELY IN THE DISCUSSIONS, OFTEN WITHOUT HAVING BEEN ASKED TO DO SO BY THE CHAIR, AND DEFENDED PROBLEMATIC LANGUAGE WITH GREATER FORCE THAN DID THE ADVOCATES OF SUCH LANGUAGE WHO WERE ON THE BUREAU. -------- OUTCOMES -------- 7. (U) THE TEXT THAT EMERGED AT THE END OF THE WEEK REPRESENTS A DRAMATIC IMPROVEMENT FROM THE SECRETARIAT DRAFT. 8. (SBU) LEGAL ISSUES. THESE PRESENTED THE MOST DIFFICULT PROBLEMS IN THE TEXT AND WERE ISSUES IN WHICH THE U.S. REPRESENTATIVE FOUND THE STRONGEST RESISTANCE FROM OTHER BUREAU MEMBERS, INCLUDING EUROPE. ONE MAJOR, ALBEIT NOT SURPRISING, DISAPPOINTMENT WAS THE RETENTION OF SEVERAL REFERENCES IN THE TEXT TO THE UNDERLYING MANDATE OF THE NEGOTIATION SET OUT AT THE WORLD FOOD SUMMIT FIVE YEARS LATER, NAMELY THE REFERENCE TO A "THE PROGRESSIVE REALIZATION OF THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD." AS PREDICTED, THE CHAIR AND ALL OTHER BUREAU MEMBERS REJECTED ENERGETIC AND CREATIVE U.S. EFFORTS TO DELETE ALL REFERENCES IN THE TEXT TO THIS FORMULATION OF THE RIGHT, ARGUING THAT THE MANDATE OF THIS GROUP'S WORK HAD ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE WORLD FOOD SUMMIT FIVE YEARS LATER AND THAT THE BUREAU DID NOT HAVE THE POWER TO REVISIT THAT DECISION. THIS MISSION WAS FURTHER COMPLICATED BY THE FACT THAT THE SECRETARIAT DRAFT USED THAT FORMULATION, OR EVEN WORSE CHARACTERIZATIONS OF IT, IN OVER THIRTY PLACES. WITH GREAT EFFORT, THE U.S. MEMBER WAS ABLE TO FIND DIFFERENT AND ACCEPTABLE WORDING FORMULATIONS IN ALL BUT A HANDFUL OF PLACES IN THE TEXT. OTHER LEGAL PROBLEMS IN THE TEXT WERE DRAMATICALLY IMPROVED. LANGUAGE SUGGESTING THAT STATES WERE OBLIGED TO HAVE A LEGALLY JUSTICIABLE RIGHT TO FOOD UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW OR THAT THEY SHOULD DO SO AS A MATTER OF DOMESTIC LAW WERE DELETED, AS WAS LANGUAGE WHICH CONFER A SPECIAL STATUS TO PROBLEMATIC GENERAL COMMENT 12 OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS. LANGUAGE SUGGESTING THAT A "RIGHT TO FOOD" IMPOSED DUTIES ON STATES IN THE CONDUCT OF THEIR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS WAS ALSO DELETED. 9. (U) OTHER ISSUES. THE TEXT WAS ALSO SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED IN THE FOLLOWING OTHER RESPECTS: (1) U.S. PROPOSALS TO ADD PARAGRAPHS EMPHASIZING ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY WERE INCORPORATED INTO THE TEXT; (2) REFERENCES TO THE NEED FOR DOMESTIC GOOD GOVERNANCE AND OTHER ELEMENTS SET OUT IN THE MONTERREY CONSENSUS WERE ADDED, MAKING IT A MUCH MORE BALANCED DOCUMENT; (3) U.S. PROPOSALS HIGHLIGHTING THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF WOMEN WERE ADDED; (4) GUIDELINES DEALING WITH "ARMED CONFLICTS" AND HUMANITARIAN LAW WERE DELETED AS BEING BEYOND THE MANDATE OF THE VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES; (5) OVERBROAD LANGUAGE ON SUCH ISSUES AS GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE AND INTERNATIONAL WATER RIGHTS WERE ALSO CORRECTED; AND (6) A SERIES OF PROBLEMATIC PARAGRAPHS ON INTERNATIONAL ACTIONS (E.G., GUIDELINES ON CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND FOREIGN POLICY) WERE DELETED. U.S. PARTICIPANTS APPRECIATED QUICK AND USEFUL GUIDANCE PROVIDED ON VERY SHORT NOTICE BY EB/IFD/ODF DEPUTY DIRECTOR BILL CRANE. ---------- NEXT STEPS ---------- ROME 00004443 003 OF 003 NG CORRECTIONS TO THE FINAL DRAFT OF THE OPENING TEXT, WHICH THE FAO IS EXPECTED TO CIRCULATE IN THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 1. MISSION UNDERSTANDS THAT THE DEPARTMENT WILL THEN BE CONTACTING CONCERNED USG AGENCIES WITH RESPECT TO THE UPCOMING OCTOBER 27-29 IGWG MEETING AT THE FAO (REF D). CLEVERLEY NNNN 2003ROME04443 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04