Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03COLOMBO1673 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03COLOMBO1673 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Colombo |
| Created: | 2003-09-26 05:13:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ETRD EAID ECON EFIN KIPR ELAB PREL CE ECONOMICS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 COLOMBO 001673 SIPDIS DEPT PLEASE PASS TO E, EB, SA/INS, SA/RA, DRL, USAID FOR BERNADETTE BUNDY - ANE/SA TREASURY FOR JERRY ADKINS DOL FOR SUDHA HALEY NSC FOR ELIZABETH MILLARD DEPT PLEASE TO USTR FOR AUSTR WILLS COMMERCE FOR ARIADNE BENAISSA E.O. 12958: DECL: ONE YEAR AFTER CONCLUSION OF US-SL FTA TAGS: ETRD, EAID, ECON, EFIN, KIPR, ELAB, PREL, CE, ECONOMICS SUBJECT: "When do we sign an FTA?" GSL perspectives, Embassy assessments on upcoming TIFA Talks Ref: A) Colombo 1386, B) Colombo 772 1. (U) Classified by Ambassador Jeffrey J. Lunstead for reasons 1.5 B and D. 2. (C) Summary: Given the high profile in Sri Lanka of this issue and local expectations for the upcoming TIFA round, Post believes it is time to take concrete steps to move towards an FTA. Specific recommendations are below in para 10. FTA negotiations can be beneficial to the US-Sri Lankan bilateral relationship for political, economic and trade policy reasons. Politically, it would show support for a forward-thinking Sri Lankan administration. Economically there are potential benefits to both countries. On US trade policy, the timing of this TIFA Round gives the USG a chance to respond in a concrete way to Sri Lanka's strong support for U.S. positions in Cancun, and to show that we will go forward with bilateral trade agreements. 3. (C) Sri Lanka is undergoing a tremendous transformation, not only with the peace process, but also through its pursuit of economic reforms. The business outlook is improving and the investment climate is good. Major U.S. companies are actively pursuing opportunities here and the potential for U.S. investment over the next five to ten years is in the billions of dollars. Pursuing FTA negotiations would send the right signal in Sri Lanka, in the U.S. and internationally. The FTA process would also complement the major assistance efforts of the international community. 4. (C) We recommend Washington seriously consider a positive, systematic response to Sri Lanka's desire for an FTA. We suggest proposing to the GSL at the upcoming TIFA talks our intent to pursue FTA negotiations, based upon results during a six month review period. During this time, Sri Lanka would meet specific benchmarks, particularly in the areas of labor, IPR enforcement, trade, investment and government procurement. USAID has indicated it could provide technical assistance to the GSL during this period, to help attain these goals. At the end of the six months, assuming Sri Lanka has met the benchmarks, the U.S. and Sri Lanka would announce that they would begin formal negotiations. End Summary. 5. (SBU) This cable lays out our thoughts on how to move forward with an FTA in the context of the upcoming TIFA talks. Separate cables will follow on specific aspects, including the investment climate, IPR protection, labor, etc. When Do We Sign an FTA? ----------------------- 6. (U) This question sums up the GSL attitude toward the bilateral trade relationship with the U.S. Post looks forward to supporting the visit by DUSTR Shiner and AUSTR Wills in October and pursuing an invigorated bilateral trade agenda with Sri Lanka. 7. (C) We suggest a more forward-leaning line on FTA negotiations, with some very specific cautions to the GSL. Pursuing FTA negotiations, in a systematic way, is in the USG's best interest for three reasons: -- Politically we would be supporting a progressive, pro- U.S. government (in a volatile, important region), that is actively pursuing a peaceful end to twenty years of communal violence, and is vigorously implementing economic reforms. -- Economically, over the long term, the US stands to gain from increased exports not only to Sri Lanka, but as this nation realizes its potential as a regional hub, to the rest of South Asia, and beyond. We are ramping up aid, and see SL as a serious contender for Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) money. Promoting free trade and increased commercial activity provides the proper balance to complement these activities. -- In the post-Cancun environment, we could seize the opportunity to reward a country that stood with us in the WTO, in the face of considerable pressure. Sri Lanka's support for USG positions at the WTO talks was obvious, notable and unprecedented. Sri Lanka would be an excellent candidate to fulfill USTR's stated intent to pursue bilateral FTAs after Cancun. 8. (C) While the Embassy views a potential FTA with Sri Lanka as a good idea for the reasons outlined above, we should set some clear benchmarks to be met before we formally agree to begin negotiations, in order to gauge the GSL's willingness and ability to deliver. Whatever the U.S. decision, however, we need to start giving some concrete answers to the GSL, as they have been forthcoming with us regarding their desires. This cable outlines a proposal that provides enough flexibility to allow the GSL to walk away from TIFA with a domestic political victory, yet still buys time for them to bring their policies and programs up to snuff before serious FTA discussion begin. Post Recommendation on TIFA Talks --------------------------------- 9. (C) Post recommends that 1) we use the TIFA talks as a forum to express our interest in pursuing an FTA, noting Sri Lanka's efforts to date on economic reform and their particularly helpful efforts in Cancun, and 2) at the TIFA meeting, we propose minimum steps that the GSL take, in order to commence formal negotiations, to be reviewed in six months. Those steps would be: -- a summary outline of gaps between GSL capabilities/standards and the Chile and Singapore FTA agreements, along with a plan of action for closing those gaps before December 2004. -- strong IPR enforcement measures, including raids, public education campaigns, law enforcement and judicial training, and prosecution of offenders. -- resolution of outstanding labor issues, particularly implementation of pending amendments to labor laws; and actions taken to ensure enforcement of labor regulations and rights in the EPZs. --streamlining the decision-making process, and increasing transparency in government procurement and tenders. Progress in the areas outlined above by April 2004 would prompt a TIFA/FTA Review session, at which point the U.S. and Sri Lanka could commit to begin FTA negotiations. 10. (C) The USG public line following TIFA could be something like: "The US and Sri Lanka have held productive discussions under the rubric of the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement and agree in principle that a bilateral Free Trade Agreement could serve both countries' best interests. In that vein, the two sides have discussed several areas of mutual concern, including labor conditions, IPR enforcement, investment climate, various governmental processes and the ongoing Sri Lankan analysis of previous U.S. free trade agreements. We see the next six months as crucial to making the progress necessary on both sides to allow formal negotiations to begin. Therefore, it is our intent to hold a TIFA review meeting in six months to consider progress and discuss the most appropriate next steps." 11. (C) We believe this plan has several benefits: -- it increases U.S. credibility in the WTO, particularly following USTR Zoellick's announcement that, in light of the failure to reach agreement in Cancun, the U.S. intends to place a higher priority on bilateral FTAs. -- it allows the GSL more time to review and prepare discussion on the Singapore and Chile FTA models, while still being able to hold up U.S. interest in an FTA as an achievement. -- it allows the USG more flexibility to use the FTA bully pulpit in public to promote reform processes and could prompt additional or enhanced programming from USAID, DOL and other USG sources, in order to build capacity for Free Trade implementation. -- it provides Sri Lanka with a performance incentive - possible FTA implementation around the time of the Multi- Fiber Agreement (MFA) expiration. Whither an FTA? --------------- 12. (C) FTA is a political hot potato here. The GSL has built up expectations and will face a real drubbing if they do not deliver. This is largely a problem of their own making as they have hyped an FTA despite USG reminders that an FTA is difficult and uncertain. Nonetheless, it is a fact we have to acknowledge and deal with. They may, however, still fail to fully grasp the magnitude of FTA negotiations and implementation. Note: USAID technical assistance could help the GSL better understand the process and develop its analysis capability. PD outreach could improve overall transparency by educating the public as well. End note. 13. (C) The GSL's seriousness of purpose is illustrated by its ongoing line-by-line analysis of the Singapore and Chile FTAs. They see four main areas of concern: national treatment (particularly in the business sector), government procurement, investment (BOI incentive programs) and financial services (most likely capital account liberalization). We will be discussing these issues with the GSL in the next days and will report further conclusions septel. 14. (C) In many respects, though, Sri Lanka is a leader in the region and a bright spot in a global context. The GSL is committed to reform, but struggling with implementation. As inter-ethnic feuds simmer and boil over elsewhere in the region, the GSL and the LTTE are pursuing a peaceful solution based somewhere in the federalism spectrum. U.S. businesses show increasing interest in Sri Lanka. Demand by American companies for commercial advocacy is growing because of sharply increased private sector interest. An FTA would certainly help promote additional U.S. exports, increasing our now relatively small (around 3 percent) share of the USD 6 Billion that Sri Lanka imports every year. 15. (C) Through its other bilateral FTAs and central location, Sri Lanka provides a tremendous opportunity to add value to U.S. content and sell to the larger South Asian regional market of over 1.5 billion people. Sri Lanka is also looking to expand market access to Southeast Asia as well. These markets hold significant potential. Also, since the Sri Lanka garment industry has virtually no fabric production capability, U.S. textile and fabric manufacturers would have the opportunity to lock in significant supply relationships under the rule of origin requirements of a potential FTA. 16. (SBU) The investment climate is sound, overall labor conditions are a strength and IPR enforcement, while currently weak, is a work in progress (we are reporting on these areas septel). 17. (C) U.S. companies such as Microsoft, Dell, Honeywell, Program Development International, Bechtel, Lockheed Martin, GE and Caterpillar are either already here, or are exploring opportunities. The potential for investment in infrastructure and market development programs over the next five to ten years is over USD 5 billion. 18. (C) As a serious contender for Millennium Challenge Account funding, Sri Lanka has shown it is moving forward with the kinds of policies that the U.S. supports. Pursuing an FTA would complement the assistance we are giving and considering. 19. (C) Finally, the GSL has fulfilled every marker we have laid down in bilateral discussions and during previous TIFA talks. Though never explicitly relating these steps to FTA, it is obvious where their motivation lies. Examples of this include passing new IPR legislation, resisting efforts to label GMO foods, supporting the U.S. in the WTO (not an easy thing to do) and attempting to ease visa restrictions. 20. (C) We can support the peace process, good governance, economic reform and U.S. companies by engaging the GSL in the free trade arena. We believe the steps outlined above can move the process forward in a way that helps Sri Lanka absorb the enormous requirements of free trade negotiations, pushes the needed reforms and drives the GSL to think strategically about its overall policy and economic structures. LUNSTEAD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04