Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ROME4020 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ROME4020 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2003-09-04 16:21:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ETRD EAGR IT EUN WTO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 004020 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT PASS USTR GENEVA FOR USTR E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, EAGR, IT, EUN, WTO SUBJECT: WTO CANCUN MINISTERIAL: ITALIAN EXPECTATIONS Sensitive But Unclassified -- Not for Internet Distribution Italian Delegation ------------------ 1. (U) In advance of next week's WTO ministerial meeting in Cancun, DCM hosted a lunch on September 3 for key GOI officials with trade responsibilities. The guests included Amedeo Teti, Director General for Commercial Agreements, Ministry of Productive Activities (Foreign Trade); Massimo Leggeri, Deputy Director General for Economic Cooperation, MFA; and Massimo Gaiani, Director, Office of EU External Relations, European Integration Directorate, MFA. All three officials will be in the Italian delegation at Cancun, which will be led by Minister of Productive Activities Antonio Marzano. The Italian delegation will also include Marzano's Vice Minister Adolfo Urso (in charge of Italian foreign trade policy) and Agriculture Minister Gianni Alemanno. The Italian delegation will number about 105 members - 40 government officials, with the rest made up of parliamentarians and union and NGO representatives. Guarded Optimism ---------------- 2. (SBU) Both Leggeri and Teti told us they were reasonably optimistic that the Cancun meetings would be judged successful. The agreement reached on TRIPS/access to medicine has removed a major obstacle that should ensure that, at the very least, Cancun will not be seen as a failure. What is more difficult is predicting the level of success to be expected at the ministerial. Teti noted that reaching agreement on frameworks for both the agriculture and non-agriculture sectors would be very positive achievements, especially if specific numbers could be plugged into those frameworks. Underscoring the difficult issues that remain unresolved, however, he also raised an idea currently floating among trade negotiators that an interim ministerial meeting may be needed next spring to help advance negotiations (at a time that would interfere less with the U.S. and the EU election calendars). Agriculture ----------- 3. (SBU) Our guests agreed that progress in the agriculture negotiations remains the key to making progress in other areas of the talks. Teti said the U.S. and the EU need to continue their close collaboration on agricultural talks -- staying focused on the three key pillars (market access, export subsidies and credits, and domestic support) was needed in order to make progress with other WTO members, especially in the developing world. Geographic Indications ---------------------- 4. (SBU) DCM raised the EU's continued efforts to expand WTO protection of geographical indications, and wondered whether the EU may be overly optimistic about making progress at Cancun, given continued strong opposition by the U.S. and many other WTO members. Teti responded that he believed there was room to bridge the U.S. and EU positions on GIs, arguing that our differences are great but not insuperable. Both the U.S. and the EU, he said, agree on the need to protect GIs, especially in the face of ever greater competition from developing countries. The argument is over how an eventual deal could incorporate both the U.S. preference for using trademark law to protect products, as well as the EU position advocating broader protection for certain GIs. Without getting into details, Leggeri suggested that it might be possible to use existing trademark mechanisms more creatively in order to obtain an agreed means of GI protection. Teti suggested that Urso might wish to discuss such an idea with USTR Zoellick at Cancun if a bilateral meeting could be arranged (with Urso wearing his EU presidency hat). (Teti also suggested that Urso may wish to push for some sort of commemoration during the talks of the second anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks.) 5. (SBU) Gaiani concluded the GI discussion by noting that the issue of GI protection would be increasingly important in the EU. In the future, European agriculture would remain competitive with other agriculture exporters on the basis of quality, but not on cost or quantity. He cautioned that the hopes of those countries seeking greater access to the EU agriculture market would not be realized without greater GI protection. "Singapore" Issues ------------------ 6. (SBU) Teti reiterated that "for the moment" Italy and the EU would continue to oppose unbundling of the four "Singapore" issues. However, he indicated that a more flexible position might be possible depending on how the talks proceed. SEMBLER NNNN 2003ROME04020 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04