Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03KATHMANDU1644 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03KATHMANDU1644 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kathmandu |
| Created: | 2003-08-27 12:50:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PTER CASC ASEC NP Maoist Insurgency |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 KATHMANDU 001644 SIPDIS DEPT FOR SA, SA/INS, DS/IP/SA, CA/OCS LONDON FOR POL/GURNEY NSC FOR MILLARD E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/26/2013 TAGS: PTER, CASC, ASEC, NP, Maoist Insurgency SUBJECT: NEPAL: MAOISTS BREAK CEASE-FIRE, ATTEMPT TO BLAME GOVERNMENT REF: KATHMANDU 1620 Classified By: Ambassador Michael E. Malinowski for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d). Summary ======== 1. (SBU) On August 27, the Maoists unilaterally withdrew from the cease-fire, blaming the Government of Nepal (GON) for refusing to accept a constituent assembly and for alleged attacks on Maoist cadres over the past month. The security forces have adopted new Rules of Engagement that allow commanders to aggressively pursue Maoists in the field. Although at least one facilitator in the peace talks is continuing last-ditch efforts to save the peace process, we expect the Maoists to resume full-scale violence against GON--and possibly civilian--targets. The Embassy held an EAC (septel) and disseminated a Warden Message. End summary. Maoists Withdraw from Cease-Fire ================================= 2. (U) In a chilling replay of their unilateral decision to break the 2001 ceasefire, on August 27, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), CPN(M), leader Pushpa Kamal Dahal (a.k.a. Prachanda) announced via the group's website that the cease-fire, code of conduct, and peace talks have "lost their relevance" (website: http://cpnm.org). (Note: The "loss of relevance" line echoes a similar Maoist press release that ended the 2001 government-Maoist peace talks. The announcement in 2001 was followed by simultaneous attacks on security forces. End note.) Prachanda blamed the Government of Nepal's (GoN's) refusal to accept a constituent assembly and attacks on Maoist cadres that were "intiated" by the Royal Nepalese Army (RNA). (Full translation of the statement is provided at paragraph 7.) Prachanda states that the Maoists remain open to talks, but only if the GoN concedes to all of the Maoists' demands. Security Forces Reply ====================== 3. (C) Brigadier General Kul Bahadur Khadka, Director of Military Operations, reported to the DATT that groups of Maoists are massing in the districts of Pyuthan (in Nepal's mid-west region), Lamjung (in Nepal's western region), and Udayapur (in Nepal's eastern region). He stated further that the National Security Council has directed the RNA to use its pre-cease-fire Rules of Engagement, which allows security forces to actively patrol and pursue armed Maoist concentrations. The RNA Division Commanders have been given authority to conduct operations within their theater of responsbility, as they see fit. According to Khadka, the Police and Army have ordered the abandonment of roughly 50 small posts in the Terai (Nepal's lowlands), with the personnel to be concentrated in larger, more defensible positions. Some small posts in the hills and mountains have already been abandoned. Peace Talks Facilitator Holds Out Hope ======================================== 4. (SBU) The Ambassador met with peace talks facilitator Shailendra Upadhaya on August 27. Upadhaya reported that the Maoists were "suspicious" of the GoN's actions and intentions even before the first round of negotiations in April. He credited the facilitators' efforts with reassuring the Maoists enough to bring them to the table. Upadhaya said he hopes to meet with Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa on August 28 or 29 to press him to issue an unequivocal statement committing the Government to continue the peace talks and to sign a proposed human rights monitoring accord. A clear statement of the GON's peaceful intentions would help dispel the "confusion" generated by Maoist propaganda that the Government is not interested in negotiations. In Upadhaya's opinion, the Maoists are not anxious to return to large-scale conflict at this point, and some hope that the peace process can be rescued remains. He believes that Prachanda's statement is only a tactic to pressure the Government into conceding to the Maoist demand for a constituent assembly. Upadhaya reported that Padma Ratna Tuladhar, the peace talks facilitator most closely associated with the Maoist leadership, had a meeting with the Prime Minister on August 27, in which the Prime Minister requested Tuladhar use his influence to keep the Maoists at the negotiating table. Upadhaya expects that the Maoists will utilize contacts and surrogates within civil society to assist them in shifting responsibility for the collapse of the talks on the GoN. Upadhaya does not believe his efforts have a good chance of success. However, he believes that the effort is worthwhile. If it fails and the Maoists remain intransigent, then the only recourse the Government would have is to try to "crush" the Maoists. Police ====== 5. (C) A senior police official told us on August 27 that he believes that the Maoists have already set up special commando units prepared to carry out targeted bombings attacks against high-ranking GON officials in the Kathmandu Valley. Another police source confirmed that the Maoists have already drafted a target list of 22 GON officials. Security of American Citizens ============================== 6. (U) The Embassy held an EAC meeting today to discuss the security situation (septel). The Embassy disseminated a Warden Message notifying American citizens on the turn of events. The Embassy will continue to monitor the situation and notify American citizens as appropriate. Comment ======== 7. (C) As expected, the Maoists are attempting to blame the GoN and RNA for its unilateral decision to break the cease-fire. They will make an effort with their assets in Nepalese civil society, including human rights groups, to rationalize or justify renewed Maoist violence as a reaction to Government abuses or aggression. This is unlikely to fly, however, with a public increasingly aware of Maoist depredations. As the Embassy reported in reftel, the Maoists have been flagarantly violating the cease-fire since August 1. In the coming days, the Embassy expects that the Maoists will folow up this rhetorical broadside with military attacks on the security forces, although probably not on reinforced, fixed positions. It is also possible that the Maoists will increase operations in urban areas, including Kathmandu, possibly including attacks on senior GON officials--a signficant change in tactics from the Maoists' pre-cease-fire modus operandi. Maoist Press Statement ======================= 7. (U) Begin Translation: Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Central Committee Press Release It is a known fact that our party was involved in peace talks and a cease-fire with the old regime with the view of the strategic balance in the civil war and in order to honor the people's desire to find a peaceful way out. Our party had taken the cease-fire and the code of conduct very seriously, and we naturally expected similar seriousness from the old regime. The People's Liberation Army under our Party observed the cease-fire and code of conduct in letter and spirit, while from the very beginning the Royal Army under the old regime kept on violating it. Even after the announcement of the cease-fire, the Royal Army not only increased unecessary checkpoints and arrests but also rounded up and arrested a group of the People's Army personnel who were peacefully staying in Kanchanpur and mercilessly killed our workers in different places, including Darchula, Makwanpur, and Bhojpur. Such activities carried out by the Royal Army at the beginning of the cease-fire hurt the hopes and aspirations of our Party and the people for a peaceful, political way out. In spite of all this, with the sense of responsbility to the country and the people, our Party continued with efforts not to spoil the environment for talks. At the first round of formal peace talks, our party presented the minimum political agenda. To strengthen the implementation of the cease-fire and code of conduct, which had been weakened by the undesirable activities of the Royal Army, and to continue talks, an agreement was reached to confine the Royal Army within five kilometers of their barracks during the second round. The Royal Army not only rejected the agreement outright, but the Army pressured the government to withdraw from the commitment. After this incident, the peace talks became orphaned and suffered from a serious crisis of confidence on the possibility of a peaceful and progressive political way out. When the new talks team of the old regime committed in principle to discipline the Royal Army and in the context of releasing our Party's Central Committee members, our Party directed its talks team to participate in the third round of peace talks with new hope. The way the establishment presented its concept paper not only ignored existing, fundamental problems, but also appeared to hatch a conspiracy to strengthen the feudalistic retrogression of October 4 with sweet toffees of reform. The concept paper, which even failed to address the demands of the major political parties who support constitutional monarchy and multiparty democracy, virtually finished the relevance of the talks by asking us to politically surrender by laying down our arms. Our talks team, while rejecting the offer totally, made it clear that the fourth round of talks could only take place if the old regime comes up with a new proposal that includes constituent assembly, otherwise there is no meaning in the continuation of the talks. Just when the third round of talks were on, the Royal Army rounded up two civilians and seventeen of our unarmed workers, who were holding their Area Committee Meeting in Doramba of Ramechhap District, and slaughtered them by tying their hands behind their backs. In this manner the concept paper presented by the establishment and the genocide of nineteen people carried out by the Royal Army in Doramba, virtually announced the break-up of the peace talks militarily. The shedding of crocodile tears and by making hue and cry about being committed to the talks is an example of extreme immorality and cunningness of the establishment to mislead the country and the world at large. It is known to everyone that our party is a revolutionary party fighting for a people's republic. We had come to the table for talks by withholding our slogan for people's republic for the time being and sought to resolve the problem through the election of a constituent assembly to fulfill the people's desire for peace and for stopping foreign interference carried out by the old regime, which is dangerous to national independence. The slogan of constituent assembly is not the slogan of communist revolutionaries. We do not see any reason to hesitate for a constituent assembly for those who believe in people's sovereignty. To hold portions of the Constitution as unchangeable and to protest against constituent assembly proves that the old regime does not have faith in the people. Our stand for constituent assembly is to ensure that the right of the people to chose and run its own political system is not undermined. There can be nothing more scientific and democratic than letting the people decide, when there is a triangular power struggle underway and danger to the nation's independence is increasing, the national interests of the country. Unfortunately, the old regime is not ready to make the people sovereign through constituent assembly. Under the circumstances, there is no alternative for the Nepalese people than to protest against the despotic activities of the old regime. Therefore, our Party wants to make it clear that the relevance of the cease-fire, the code of conduct, and the peace process with the old regime has ended. Our Party wants to extend its sincere gratitude and thanks to the peace talks facilitators, all the political parties, human rights organizations, intellectuals, the people, and friends here and abroad and express our desire to continue our relationship through regular interactions. We will not close the door for talks from our side. We can again sit for talks in order to establish people's sovereign power and fundamental interest. Our party heartily requests all the people-oriented powers here and abroad to create such environment and extend cooperation. August 27, 2003 Prachanda Chairman CPN (Maoists) Central Committee End translation. MALINOWSKI
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04