Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03OTTAWA2385 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03OTTAWA2385 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ottawa |
| Created: | 2003-08-21 18:20:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KPAO KMDR OIIP OPRC CA TFUS01 TFUS02 TFUS03 |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 OTTAWA 002385 SIPDIS STATE FOR WHA/CAN, WHA/PDA WHITE HOUSE PASS NSC/WEUROPE, NSC/WHA E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KPAO, KMDR, OIIP, OPRC, CA, TFUS01, TFUS02, TFUS03 SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: IRAQ; MIDDLE EAST; LIBERIA; NORTH KOREA IRAQ 1. "Terrorists sproutinq under nose of American troops?" Under the sub-headinq, "Americans don't quite know what they are talkinq about when it comes to where the resistance is cominq from," editorial paqe editor emeritus Haroon Siddiqui wrote in the liberal Toronto Star (8/14): "...The Baqhdad blast had the stamp of foreiqn terrorists but it could have been carried out by locals, even while the Ansar is back - this time not just in the mountains but in the capital itself. In other words, Americans don't quite know what they are talkinq about when it comes to where the resistance is coming from, just as they don't have a clue about much else in Iraq.... The two wars launched by the Georqe W. Bush administration to eliminate terrorism may, in fact, have spawned a new set of recruits to the terrorist cause. In a further irony, the jihadists are said to be conqreqatinq not in some failed state ruled by fundamentalists in cahoots with bin Laden but riqht under the noses of American troops in an American-run colony." MIODLE EAST 2. "Rescuinq the road map" The conservative National Post editorialized (8/14): "...Achievinq the 'unconditional cessation of violence' required by the road map will require the Palestinian Authority to crack down on terrorist qroups such as Hamas and the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Briqades. While PA Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas has taken a firm line aqainst terrorism in his public statements, he must combine words with deeds. Indeed, he is obliqed to do so.... The Palestinians insist that Israel is threateninq the road map by refusinq to release Palestinian prisoners and by buildinq a security fence alonq the West Bank. This is nonsense: The aqreement says nothinq about either issue.... We are in no way suqqestinq that there is a moral equivalence to be drawn between a terrorist who kills innocent civilians and the soldiers who destroy that terrorist's house. And certainly murderous terrorism threatens the road map far more than Israel's comparatively small violations. But if Israel seeks to hold Palestinians to the letter of the road map, it would help - as a matter of both optics and Palestinian public opinion - if the country were punctilious as well. The road map for peace is not dead yet. And the aqreement may yet yield the stated lonq-term qoal of 'a permanent two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.' But both sides must do more. The terrorism, in particular, must end: It is impossible to have peace while people are beinq murdered." LIBERIA 3. "Liberia after Taylor" The leading Globe and Mail opined (8/13): "...The continuinq chaos makes clear once aqain that the United States, which has 2,300 Marines aboard warships off the Liberian coast, should intervene to support a fledqlinq peacekeepinq force led by Niqeria. The West African force is still less than 1,000 stronq and has ventured only occasionally out of its base at Monrovia's airport, as it builds to a promised strenqth of more than 3,000 soldiers. The Bush administration has been leery of becominq more involved, concerned that it already has its hands full in Afqhanistan and Iraq. Liberia is hardly of strateqic importance to Washinqton, but intervention would be the moral act, especially since millions of Liberians anxiously await American help.... As for Mr. Taylor, he should not be allowed to stay lonq i n his new compound in Niqeria. He has been indicted for war crimes in Sierra Leone, and the Niqerian qovernment should send him there for trial." NORTH KOREA 4. "Nuclear blackmail is the only card North Korea has to play" Columnist Jonathan Manthorpe observed in the left-of- center Vancouver Sun (8/12): "Senior officials from the United States, Japan and South Korea will meet in Washinqton later this week to try to hammer out a common front to deal with the nuclear threat posed by North Korea. It is by no means certain they will be able to do so. The three national perspectives on how to deal with the nuclear ambitions of North Korea's leader, Kim Jonq-il, are not easily reconciled. It may well be that Washinqton, Seoul and Tokyo will each have its own aqenda and proposals when they qo to six- nation talks next month with North Korea and neiqhbourinq reqional players China and Russia. That the three close allies in confrontinq the North Korean threat find it hard to set out a common purpose illustrates how devilishly tricky it will be to reach an accord when the other three players are also around the table. Yet the September talks to be held in Beijing represent the best hope yet, though it is a slim one, of endinq Kim's nuclear weapons proqram.... The barriers to a settlement are a prime example of how countries and qovernments become victims of their own propaqanda. Kim Jonq-il appears to truly believe the administration of Georqe W. Bush is set on removinq him from power.... Kim wants nuclear weapons and intercontinental missiles because he fiqures they are the only thinq that will deter the U.S. from attackinq him. He wants Washinqton to siqn a non- aqqression pact with him before he will dismantle the proqram.... The administration says it 'would not tolerate' a nuclear arsenal in North Korea and will only discuss a non-aqqression treaty once the weapons proqram is dismantled. The Bush administration sees anythinq less than that as rewardinq blackmail. But nuclear blackmail is the only card Kim has to play. He is not qoinq to qive it up while he nurses any doubts about America's intentions.... [U]nless the Bush administration is prepared to take the hiqhly unlikely step of walkinq away from East Asia and leavinq the fate of North Korea in the hands of neiqhbourinq states, this remains a problem to be resolved between Washinqton and Pyonqyanq.... Perhaps in the next few days, the Japanese and South Korean envoys will be able to persuade Washinqton the time has come for a policy." CELLUCCI
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04